This is your second non-comment in this thread. You are going to have to type more clearly, becaue this is jibberish.
Yea I agreed with all of that. I noted that for this "award" people were going to see it as a huge upset.
But when you rip away the historical view of the 4 programs, when you get away from the incorrect feeling that "mid-majors" aren't supposed to win games against OU football and Kansas basketball, reality should set in.
Again I understand how both games "feel" like an upset to people, big bad OU loses to little ole Boise and big bad Kansas loses to little ole Northern Iowa. These upsets "felt good" to a lot of people and that's why they got a lot of votes.
But the reality is Boise over OU wasn't even an upset at all, and Northern Iowa over Kansas was a mild upset. This is a reality based on the how good the teams were that specific year/time of year, not a historic view or overall program comparison.
I think you are somewhat agreeing with what I'm saying, but feel I don't understand why it won the award. Hopefully this clears it up.
Yea I think this further proves what I am saying. A lot of people who meet a high percentage of OU football fans and a high percentage of KU basketball fans will often times come away unimpressed. Furthermore, OU football and KU basketball have had so much success, that jealousy and resentment will come through, so when they lose to a team that is "perceived" to be far lesser and far inferior, it illicits an emotional response. Thus you have the winners of the award, but neither was really a big upset.