WTSooner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2011
- Messages
- 11,801
- Reaction score
- 842
This. And it really doesn't matter that the MSU and AP apologists think otherwise.
It does matter. Valentine has an award b/c they "thought otherwise".
This. And it really doesn't matter that the MSU and AP apologists think otherwise.
It does matter. Valentine has an award b/c they "thought otherwise".
It does matter. Valentine has an award b/c they "thought otherwise".
Matters to you, obviously.
Matters to you, obviously.
lol
My only argument is that at the end of the regular season, or the end of the conference postseason tournaments, when I imagine most of these votes were due in, it was a close race. Close enough that anybody getting upset either way is simply getting upset to get upset. Yes, we all think Buddy should have won. And I'm sure the MSU fans, at that time, thought Valentine should win.
If they were smart they'd wait until the NCAA Tourney was over to have folks vote, but nobody is going to give a crap about that award if it's handed out a week after the last game. It is what it is. Not sure why OU fans always feel like everybody is out to get them and our teams. It's childish.
Or because there are a lot of lazy, ill-informed sports writers who can't be bothered to do even a little research. And there are more of them covering Big 10 basketball than cover the Big 12.
I hope at least a few of them are embarrassed today. They should be.
lol
My only argument is that at the end of the regular season, or the end of the conference postseason tournaments, when I imagine most of these votes were due in, it was a close race. Close enough that anybody getting upset either way is simply getting upset to get upset. Yes, we all think Buddy should have won. And I'm sure the MSU fans, at that time, thought Valentine should win.
If they were smart they'd wait until the NCAA Tourney was over to have folks vote, but nobody is going to give a crap about that award if it's handed out a week after the last game. It is what it is. Not sure why OU fans always feel like everybody is out to get them and our teams. It's childish.
Rich coming from a guy that admitted recently that he threw together a half-a$$ed article on his favorite team, as part of his job.
But whatevs.
Could have fooled me.
TU was spewing multiple excuses for MSU's loss to MTSU in the tourney as well. If OU had lost in the first round now way he posts the same things. But I am glad the Tulsa alum is here to keep us honest.
Rich coming from a guy that admitted recently that he threw together a half-a$$ed article on his favorite team, as part of his job.
But whatevs.
1. I gave ONE reason why MSU lost.
2. Depends how OU loses. I've defended OU losses in the past, and I've called some of them bad.
3. TU alum. lol. As if my OU fandom really gets to be questioned.
This idea that an assist should be given as much credit, when assessing a player's stats, as a made shot (or free throw) is -- with respect, abd -- laughable.
I'm not saying no credit should be given for assists, but if a PG makes an easy pass to a talented teammate behind the line and that player hits a three? Sorry, that should NOT be three points to the PG's credit. If you're going to give the PG credit for every made shot he sets up with a pass, maybe you should dock him some points for the times he makes a pass to an open player and they miss the shot.
Yes, that last is a ridiculous suggestion, but so is the idea that the assist man gets as much credit as the scorer. On rare plays, when a particularly stellar pass is made, sure, but most assists would not qualify.
That's dumb... to average nearly 8 assists per game (7.8) is pretty ridiculous. There are lots of full-time point guards who don't average that, or even close to it. It's an absurd amount of assists for someone who also gets a lot of rebounds and also scores nearly 20 points a game.
- He rebounds way better than Khadeem Lattin, OU's center, whose full time job is to defend and rebound
- He gets way more assists than OU's leading assist person
- He shoots a comparable percentage from 3 than Buddy Hield, the best 3pt shooter in the nation
- He scores nearly 20 points per game
1. I gave ONE reason why MSU lost.
2. Depends how OU loses. I've defended OU losses in the past, and I've called some of them bad.
3. TU alum. lol. As if my OU fandom really gets to be questioned.
So if OU gives up 90 points on Saturday in a loss, you will call it one of those days?
Like I said, I am glad you are here to set everyone straight.