It's funny that one of our posters consistently wants to brag about our defense in his praise of Brent as if Brent is simply our DC. It's also amusing that he throws around teams like Indiana and Ohio State in comparison to OU. Let's see, one just pulled off the greatest turnaround in college sports history and is the reigning champion, another won the title two years ago and is always in the playoff, and the third has . . . one top 10 finish, no playoff wins, and two sub-.500 seasons in four years. Yet people who point out that we need more high-end draft picks are "dorks."
It is simply beyond any (rational) debate that we need more first round and second day talent on our roster if we are going to compete for titles, or, at the very least, playoff wins, which should be the expectation. Now, if the goal is simply to have a highly rated defense that can help us win nine or 10 games and produce a day two pick (or two) plus a few Saturday picks, that's a different question. But last I checked, OU doesn't hang banners to celebrate top 5 defenses.
This year was a step in the right direction, given how anemic our drafts had been the previous couple years. And I am not arguing that there isn't reason to think things will be even better in the next year or two. All I posted was that we need more early picks to be in the mix for a title, and somehow Brent's acolyte turned it into a manifesto about "elite defense."