Sam
New member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2008
- Messages
- 6,081
- Reaction score
- 0
Maybe they thought that Nick could hit some 3's because Baylor plays a zone all game?
Maybe airball number 1, or 2 or perhaps could've tipped Capel off it wasn't Nick's night...
Maybe they thought that Nick could hit some 3's because Baylor plays a zone all game?
Maybe airball number 1, or 2 or perhaps could've tipped Capel off it wasn't Nick's night...
Nick Thompson made our team significantly worse every moment he was on the court tonight.
We are better with Thompson on the floor. Sure he made some mistakes and was out of control some but those things will go away with more minutes. And as he improves the team will improve.
What I don't get is how people ignore the fact that getting killed on the boards has been our biggest weakness all season.
But last night we were winning the battle of the boards, as the announcers pointed out numerous times, against a bigger team until late in the game and Thompson was a big reason why.
What I don't get is how 1 game people cry about how we can't play with 4 guards in the Big XII and the next game the exact same people criticize the 6'9" guy who gave us the size to be within a bucket in the 2nd half of a game most of you predicted us to be losing by 50 points.
We are better with Thompson on the floor. Sure he made some mistakes and was out of control some but those things will go away with more minutes. And as he improves the team will improve.
Maybe they feel like they should play because they jumped the gun and named him captain?
Who knows...
I remember a comment I made in a post last season after we had been soundly beaten on the boards by a team that we really should have outrebounded. I said something to the effect that: “It seemed like every missed shot bounced straight to one of the opposing players.” Well, I was flamed unmercifully for making such a comment and told that teams win the battle of the boards simply because they want the reboounds more than their opponent.
Now, all of sudden, NT leads the team in rebounds because the ball bounces right to him? Go figure. :ez-laugh:
I remember a comment I made in a post last season after we had been soundly beaten on the boards by a team that we really should have outrebounded. I said something to the effect that: “It seemed like every missed shot bounced straight to one of the opposing players.” Well, I was flamed unmercifully for making such a comment and told that teams win the battle of the boards simply because they want the reboounds more than their opponent.
Now, all of sudden, NT leads the team in rebounds because the ball bounces right to him? Go figure. :ez-laugh:
The comment that he only got rebounds because they bounced to him was a moronic comment. I agree with you here. That's 2 things we agree on in the last week. :woot
The comment that he only got rebounds because they bounced to him was a moronic comment. I agree with you here. That's 2 things we agree on in the last week. :woot
Is this a trend, booger? Or just the biggest coincidence in the history of the world? :ez-laugh:
I shouldn't have put the only in there and later I said most of the time. Besides that its a true statement.
:facepalm
nick has potential to be a good player but he isn't there yet. And imo the reason nick was getting rebounds is because they bounced his way, not b/c he was boxing out a bigger guy or in position most of the time
you don't agree with the following