1) Blake could have had 30 that game. OU's balance was so good they didn't need blake and the game was out of reach so no need to stockpile stats. Willie, AJ, and Tony all scored 15 plus
2. What you said was OU would win by 10 and KU had matched up well with OU. I conceded the PG arguement but I wouldn't conced that the stiff would hold down Blake.
3) Conley couldnt get with Blake and it is laughable for you to think Aldrich will. Blake's no Okaunu, or Jordan Hill, but he's pretty capable.
Basically if you're saying Blake will play better against KU than Texas, Blake is going to pretty much clinch National POY. Don't know if you were aware of Blake's stat line for the UT game but blake was 8 for 13 from the field with a Three pt. field goal, two mid range bank shots, and a nice jump hook in the lane.
My friend, you are the one who doesn't get it. KU has got beat in dominant ways by dominant ways to a horrible, absolutely horrible, Arizona team on the road. They got manhandle by a MSU team that I think is equal to OU. However, you guys figure that KU will not lose in the same fashion. It's not about a scoring number, it's not about a players stats, it's about me thinking OU will win in a very dominant way.
You would think that you two KU fans would come off of the idea that OU can't dominate KU. You keep trying to get cover by saying it will be a double digit vic for OU, but you never say that OU may potentially embarrass KU. Especially since you know how road games go i.e. TAMU last night. Me and alot of OU fans are sick of your antics. Just because we feel good about our team, you start throwing out phrases like arrogant and gawk. It is arrogant on your part to want us to be humbled in a debate versus you because you are a fan of the great KU. The last straw was when you guys showed up at the Kstate game. You and Grace didn't have to be so disrespectful.
gold is so 80s, Cheno.