Memories are fun. But, I have none of Bruce Drake, nor do I know a lot about those years. That was an era in which Henry Iba became known as a great coach because he had a seven-footer who blocked all shots by goal-tending, leading to the goal-tending rules. Somehow, that garnered him a reputation as a great coach, as well as two national titles.
I had high hopes for Lester Lane because I liked him personally, and he was a great student of the game. Unfortunately, we hired two coaches that had a difficult time about that time, McKenzie.
I did have a great respect for what Tubbs and Sampson did. If we really wanted to become a basketball power, we probably would have jumped in to support a program with one of these guys rather than being about half adversarial. You need someone with that type of dedication and sense of direction. A lot of schools build temporary success stories. But, Kansas, Kentucky, Duke, North Carolina---these are programs built by coaches, reputation, alumni, and fans who live and breathe basketball, as OU does for football. Even UCLA doesn't fare all that well without Wooden, and they had the greatest run of all. Indiana wants to be, but stops just short of perennial power.
We have a good coach. I think he fits what most fans in Oklahoma want. I don't know that I've seen much interest in taking a larger step. It would take more commitment, more risk than the administration or fans would probably give. I don't think we'll win a title with Lon. But, we haven't won a title with anyone else either.
He is old enough that he will probably retire soon. It will be interesting to see what type of step the administration takes at that time. I would bet that someone will want to hire the Texas coach, whoever he might be.