afaSooner
New member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 437
- Reaction score
- 0
Am I the only one that argued that not only would Kevin Durant be a very good NBA player but that it wouldn't surprise me if he would dominate the NBA? Here's your chance to come out and give it up to yourself if I wasn't. I remember a lot of basketball fans claiming Kevin would not be successful in the NBA. Just to revisit this subject let's look at the facts:
Kevin Durant is 6-10 and plays like a guard. Yes he is skinny but why would that fact alone outweigh his many other attributes that indicate he's the real deal? He has the ability to play anywhere on the court because of his outside shot. He creates mismatches 98% of the time when he has the ball in his hands . Smaller quicker guys with the ability to guard Durant can't harrass his shot. Bigger/taller guys with the size to guard Durant get caught out on an island as he routinely either drives past them or draws the foul. He plays above the rim, he's a fantastic free throw shooter, and like a guard can penetrate the lane almost at will. You add all that up and you're looking at a top 3 guy in the NBA right now.
In all seriousness it's easy to under appreciate a Horn and for that fact alone I can understand the other side of this debate but there was definitely two sides to this thing. Does anyone else remember the opinions on Durant before and after the NBA draft? All I heard was how Greg Oden was the easy pick and how Durant wouldn't be nearly as effective in the NBA as he was in college. Turns out that Durant was actually less effective in college than now as a pro. It's been the other way around.
Kevin Durant is 6-10 and plays like a guard. Yes he is skinny but why would that fact alone outweigh his many other attributes that indicate he's the real deal? He has the ability to play anywhere on the court because of his outside shot. He creates mismatches 98% of the time when he has the ball in his hands . Smaller quicker guys with the ability to guard Durant can't harrass his shot. Bigger/taller guys with the size to guard Durant get caught out on an island as he routinely either drives past them or draws the foul. He plays above the rim, he's a fantastic free throw shooter, and like a guard can penetrate the lane almost at will. You add all that up and you're looking at a top 3 guy in the NBA right now.
In all seriousness it's easy to under appreciate a Horn and for that fact alone I can understand the other side of this debate but there was definitely two sides to this thing. Does anyone else remember the opinions on Durant before and after the NBA draft? All I heard was how Greg Oden was the easy pick and how Durant wouldn't be nearly as effective in the NBA as he was in college. Turns out that Durant was actually less effective in college than now as a pro. It's been the other way around.