But most of them SHOULD be interested. That's the tradition Billy Tubbs started and Kelvin Sampson maintained. For about 25 years, OU was the #1 destination for the best-of-the-best JUCO players.
This. 100% agree.
I'd also argue that the JUCO programs aren't beneficial to schools all over the country. Seems like that talent is kind located in the midwest and maybe southern states. Obviously Oregon, and the Cali schools, and even the NE schools would be at a disadvantage.
Even that article I posted from 2002.... Kelvin said this is unique to this area, and maybe even to OU.
Correct me if I’m wrong, ABD, but it’s your position that ou should recruit jucos over high school players for the most part. It’s your belief that we can’t get the good high school players consistently so we might as well try to get the best 3-4 jucos every year. That is the debate.
Essentially, yes. With an asterisk though. My official position, if I was explaining it to Joe Castiglione, is that because of the history of the program, geographic proximity to the schools, and recruiting realities of the program that OU should have one of the coaches scouting junior colleges in Texas, Kansas, Missouri, Iowa, and a few others in Idaho, Wyoming, and Florida that always seem to produce very good talent... FULL TIME. OU needs to be best program on these guy in the early period. And, I think they would be. Normally the other programs aren't pouring in until way later.
If we need a big guy, shooters, scorers, whatever... and one is ready to pull the trigger on OU early in the recruiting season that is a legit talent, you sign him November, end of story. You take Shak Juiston instead of fighting for the top 70 guy to the end, etc.
I can't find the article, but I read once where OU's relationship with these schools was so good that they would call Billy and Kelvin and say "I got a player here, and you will want him"...
There isn't a doubt in my mind that OU could have been a finalist or the selection, in recent years, for these guys we keep talking about. The past few seasons for OU would have been a lot different if that were true.
Also, it really needs to be from the good juco leagues. Kansas, Texas, Iowa, Florida as the primary.
Look at some of the duds:
Nick Thompson: Utah
Ty Lazenby: Oklahoma
Omar Leary: Colorado
Casey Arent: California
CJ Washington: Oklahoma
Chris Walker: California
Then look at the good ones, OU and the recent examples:
Ebi Ere: Kansas
Jason Detrick: Missouri
Taj Gray: Kansas
Terrell Everett: Missouri
Quannas White: Texas
Nolan Johnson: Texas
Mike Neal: Texas
Rob Gray: Texas
Vladimir Broadziansky: Kansas
Shak Juiston: Kansas
Kelley Newton: Kansas
Loal Acuil: Kansas
Corey Davis: Texas
Ace Mcghee: Indiana
Are they all good from these schools? No. But the leagues are just better in Texas, Kansas, Iowa, and Florida. There is a more consistent pattern with Kansas, Texas, Missouri, and Iowa. Which plays well into OU's hands.
If I had it my way, I would have tried very hard for this years class to be:
Ricky Torres (Missouri)
Devonte Bandoo (Kansas)
Antun Miricevic (Wyoming)
Jamal Bienemy
The year before I would have tried to get:
Shak Juiston (Kansas juco)
DeQuon Lake (Iowa juco)
Brady Manek (Oklahoma HS)
Trae Young (Oklahoma HS)
The year before I would have tried to get:
Donovan Jackson (Iowa juco… all big 12 player)
Niem Stevenson (Texas juco)
Kristian Doolittle (Oklahoma HS)
etc
You see the pattern... Man oh man if OU would have had Juiston and Lake on this years team.. Of course, if you have those guys you wouldn't have others. If you had Jackson, Stevenson, etc you wouldn't have McGusty, James, Sheph, Mcnease, etc. I think it's clear OU would have had Doolittle, Young, Manek, etc regardless.
So my position isn't ALL juco, but it is juco heavy. At least 2 per year, signed early, of guys like mentioned above. If you can't sign em, you can't sign em… but I would be trying very hard to get the best ways and to make OU the #1 destination for them again.