cowboysooner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2008
- Messages
- 1,322
- Reaction score
- 110
At the 5: Fitz, Arent and Honore are better than last year's Fitz and Honore.
At the 4: Osby, a stronger Neal and CJ are better than last year's CJ and Thompson
At the 2/3: Clark and newell appear improved, but will need to see pledger to determine whether wings will be as good as last year. Either way, I think we will be about as good.
At the point: Grooms and an improved Blair are light years ahead of blair and newell last year (even at the end of last year).
So, I don't know what this means relative to wins and losses. But, I think we will be appreciably more competitive this year and a better team.
Liked the look of Arent (he isn't a stiff at all and will bang) and grooms (easily the best ballhandler and on ball defender at the point in a while)
Agree that you can't tell much overall against an opponent like NSU
At the 4: Osby, a stronger Neal and CJ are better than last year's CJ and Thompson
At the 2/3: Clark and newell appear improved, but will need to see pledger to determine whether wings will be as good as last year. Either way, I think we will be about as good.
At the point: Grooms and an improved Blair are light years ahead of blair and newell last year (even at the end of last year).
So, I don't know what this means relative to wins and losses. But, I think we will be appreciably more competitive this year and a better team.
Liked the look of Arent (he isn't a stiff at all and will bang) and grooms (easily the best ballhandler and on ball defender at the point in a while)
Agree that you can't tell much overall against an opponent like NSU