DSMok1
Member
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 340
- Reaction score
- 0
OU vs. Centenary Statistical Plus/Minus
Two dominant player-performances last night: Crocker and Gallon were simply splendid. Crocker played a nearly flawless game. 33 points, 13 rebounds, 3 blocks, 1 steal... are you kidding me? Wow! And Tiny was just about as good. Eight, yes, EIGHT offensive rebounds, 16 points efficiently, 3 blocks, and 2 steals. Amazing. With those performances, the rest of the team could just stand back and watch.
(Boxscore)
OU Statistical +/-
Centenary Statistical +/-
Willie played a decent game as well; he only turned the ball over once, grabbed 3 steals, and dished out 4 assists. However, he didn't score very well or get many rebounds. TMG played a similar game--okay.
Most of the subs played bad games, though Orlando Allen did nicely in his 3 minutes. Cade played very poorly--hew was almost invisible on the box score.
For Centenary, there were no outstanding players in this game. They were rather outclassed.
As a team, OU has a top 50 offense but a still-weak defense. Centenary scored almost a point per possession... not that good for OU. OU's problem? They don't force turnovers, and their opponents shoot above average from the floor.
Here are the totals through 9 games, with the minutes per game listed:
OU Statistical +/- Nine Game Totals
Tony Crocker has taken over the position as best player on the team so far this year. He is really playing well! Willie is still doing well; Cade has faded a bit, but Tiny is coming on strong. TMG should soon get out of the basement as he improves.
Two dominant player-performances last night: Crocker and Gallon were simply splendid. Crocker played a nearly flawless game. 33 points, 13 rebounds, 3 blocks, 1 steal... are you kidding me? Wow! And Tiny was just about as good. Eight, yes, EIGHT offensive rebounds, 16 points efficiently, 3 blocks, and 2 steals. Amazing. With those performances, the rest of the team could just stand back and watch.
(Boxscore)
OU Statistical +/-
Code:
Player SPM Min Contribution
Crocker, Tony 24.4 33 13.5
Gallon, Tiny 20.7 29 10.1
Warren, Willie 6.6 29 3.2
Gerber, Beau 137.2 1 2.3
Mason-Griffin, Tommy 1.4 31 0.7
Allen, Orlando 6.9 3 0.3
Wright, Ryan -5.8 10 -1.0
Franklin, T -20.6 3 -1.0
Fitzgerald, Andrew -14.5 8 -1.9
Pledger, Steven -9.2 17 -2.6
Willis, Ray -19.3 10 -3.2
Davis, Cade -19.1 26 -8.3
Code:
Player SPM Min Contribution
PEREZ, David 1.9 33 1.1
MACIEL, Pedro 1.4 22 0.5
STARRING, Daman 0.5 38 0.3
SWARTZ, David -3.7 20 -1.2
BONHAM, Jerrald -3.4 22 -1.3
NAKWAASAH, Maxx -6.1 24 -2.5
MARSEILLE, Matt -9.8 19 -3.1
TUBNER, Roman -15.8 22 -5.8
Willie played a decent game as well; he only turned the ball over once, grabbed 3 steals, and dished out 4 assists. However, he didn't score very well or get many rebounds. TMG played a similar game--okay.
Most of the subs played bad games, though Orlando Allen did nicely in his 3 minutes. Cade played very poorly--hew was almost invisible on the box score.
For Centenary, there were no outstanding players in this game. They were rather outclassed.
As a team, OU has a top 50 offense but a still-weak defense. Centenary scored almost a point per possession... not that good for OU. OU's problem? They don't force turnovers, and their opponents shoot above average from the floor.
Here are the totals through 9 games, with the minutes per game listed:
OU Statistical +/- Nine Game Totals
Code:
Name SPM Min Contribution
Tony Crocker 6.7 32.1 30.6
Willie Warren 6.2 28.1 26.8
Cade Davis 3.4 25.3 11.7
Tiny Gallon 1.4 25.9 7.4
Steven Pledger 1.6 23.2 6.2
Kyle Hardrick -1.0 0.3 -0.1
Beau Gerber -15.1 0.4 -1.4
T.J. Franklin -21.3 1.0 -3.3
Orlando Allen -7.1 4.8 -5.3
Ray Willis -12.7 3.0 -5.9
Andrew Fitzgerald -4.5 9.9 -6.6
Ryan Wright -3.6 14.2 -8.3
Tommy Mason-Griffin -1.9 31.8 -9.4
Tony Crocker has taken over the position as best player on the team so far this year. He is really playing well! Willie is still doing well; Cade has faded a bit, but Tiny is coming on strong. TMG should soon get out of the basement as he improves.
Statistical Plus/Minus (SPM) is a method of estimating each player's impact from the box score statistics. SPM is listed in points above the average player playing per 100 possessions--so if that player was replaced by an average player for 100 possessions, SPM is the difference in the final margin. The total of all player's contributions will sum to the actual scoring margin (each team's total will equal half of the overall margin). The original method was outlined by Dan Rosenbaum at 82games.com; recently additional factors were added by Neil Paine at Basketball-Reference.com. I previously compiled the complete 2008-2009 NCAA numbers on this forum.