Posts like these are why I appreciate posters like Seniorsooner - someone who doesn't like the job Coach Capel is doing, but won't revise history to make his point.
There is nothing really to debate about Coach Capel's first season. Most objective people will stipulate that a seasoned coach would have squeezed an extra victory or two out of that team...big deal. To say he should have won 20 games with that team is completely absurd. The team only won 20 games the previous year - and lost their top 3 players with no one of impact to replace them. Is it really that difficult to conclude 2007 was going to be a rebuilding season?
As for year two, Jeff Capel actually exceeded expectations. How? For only the second time in 20 years, OU actually won a 1st round NCAA Tournament game with a seed lower than #3. We were a putrid 1-7 the previous 20 years, despite three of those seven losses as a #4 seed. That's a FACT, not some revisionist theory.