Sherri is WAY over paid! Why...

I've never heard that about Sherri. Do you have a link? If she raises money, does the money raised go into the women's basketball budget? If so, shouldn't their budget be in the black? Just curious.

OU's women's program is pretty much in the black. All 15 scholarships (Sherri's never had 15 scholarship players) are endowed in perpetuity, and OU isn't a program that runs crazy on spending.

Some of her fund-raising goes to the athletic department, a larger part goes to the University. She raises literally millions of dollars every year.

P.S. Give me time and I'll give you multiple links. Just not tonight...
 
Last edited:
OU's women's program is pretty much in the black. All 15 scholarships (Sherri's never had 15 scholarship players) are endowed in perpetuity, and OU isn't a program that runs crazy on spending.

Some of her fund-raising goes to the athletic department, a larger part goes to the University. She raises literally millions of dollars every year.

P.S. Give me time and I'll give you multiple links. Just not tonight...

No problem, just when it's convenient. Thanks!
 
OU's women's program is pretty much in the black. All 15 scholarships (Sherri's never had 15 scholarship players) are endowed in perpetuity, and OU isn't a program that runs crazy on spending.

Some of her fund-raising goes to the athletic department, a larger part goes to the University. She raises literally millions of dollars every year.

P.S. Give me time and I'll give you multiple links. Just not tonight...

I think you're right (seen some blurbs) regarding overall fundraising. BUT if I had endowed a scholarship (2005-2006 or 07...all 15 were done), I'd be just a little perturbed if any of my decision believed the program would maintain it's top 10 status or if one of the fundraising points made said anything about needing a program with endowed scholarships for effective recruiting of top players. I'd be quite disappointed. Those endowments meant a check in the neighborhood of $200K was written...15 times.

EDIT: I was right...

"June 27, 2007

NORMAN, Okla. -- The University of Oklahoma women's basketball program is making history this week by achieving a feat accomplished by only a few such programs in the nation - successful completion of a fund-raising campaign endowing all 15 scholarship positions.

"We began the endowment program in 2005 with a goal of creating a perpetual source of funding for our women's basketball program," said OU head coach Sherri Coale. "The full endowment of all 15 scholarships puts us in a position to achieve self-sufficiency, an accomplishment achieved by very few programs across the country."

In the span of only 30 months, Coale and company have completed the campaign, which endows each position with a $200,000 gift from OU alumni and friends."


http://www.soonersports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=31000&ATCLID=208402745
 
Last edited:
I think you're right (seen some blurbs) regarding overall fundraising. BUT if I had endowed a scholarship (2005-2006 or 07...all 15 were done), I'd be just a little perturbed if any of my decision believed the program would maintain it's top 10 status or if one of the fundraising points made said anything about needing a program with endowed scholarships for effective recruiting of top players. I'd be quite disappointed. Those endowments meant a check in the neighborhood of $200K was written...15 times.

EDIT: I was right...

"June 27, 2007

NORMAN, Okla. -- The University of Oklahoma women's basketball program is making history this week by achieving a feat accomplished by only a few such programs in the nation - successful completion of a fund-raising campaign endowing all 15 scholarship positions.

"We began the endowment program in 2005 with a goal of creating a perpetual source of funding for our women's basketball program," said OU head coach Sherri Coale. "The full endowment of all 15 scholarships puts us in a position to achieve self-sufficiency, an accomplishment achieved by very few programs across the country."

In the span of only 30 months, Coale and company have completed the campaign, which endows each position with a $200,000 gift from OU alumni and friends."


http://www.soonersports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=31000&ATCLID=208402745

And that's only the women's basketball program, not covering the money raised for the department or the University...
 
You have a roster full of freshmen and sophomores, including a freshman and two sophomores in the starting line up.

You're currently the second best team in the best conference in the nation.

There are eight other Big 12 teams who wish they sucked as bad as OU right now. :ez-laugh:
 
Last edited:
I think you're right (seen some blurbs) regarding overall fundraising. BUT if I had endowed a scholarship (2005-2006 or 07...all 15 were done), I'd be just a little perturbed if any of my decision believed the program would maintain it's top 10 status or if one of the fundraising points made said anything about needing a program with endowed scholarships for effective recruiting of top players. I'd be quite disappointed. Those endowments meant a check in the neighborhood of $200K was written...15 times.

EDIT: I was right...

"June 27, 2007

NORMAN, Okla. -- The University of Oklahoma women's basketball program is making history this week by achieving a feat accomplished by only a few such programs in the nation - successful completion of a fund-raising campaign endowing all 15 scholarship positions.

"We began the endowment program in 2005 with a goal of creating a perpetual source of funding for our women's basketball program," said OU head coach Sherri Coale. "The full endowment of all 15 scholarships puts us in a position to achieve self-sufficiency, an accomplishment achieved by very few programs across the country."

In the span of only 30 months, Coale and company have completed the campaign, which endows each position with a $200,000 gift from OU alumni and friends."


http://www.soonersports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=31000&ATCLID=208402745


No one can question the endowed scholarships and Sherri should be commended for accomplishing this feat. To date I do not that the men's BB program has accomplished this nor to my knowledge does the football team have 85 endowed scholarships. Could be wrong but I do not think so.

However the women's basketball program is still a major expense to the athletic department (not to university as the athletic department is self sufficient). Per the 2013-14 athletic department annual budget provided to me by the athletic department OU's basketball revenue was approximately 1% of their $111,000,000 budget ($1.11 million) and expenses were approximately 3% of the $110,950,000 expenses (-$3.33 million). That is an annual program loss of approximately $2.22 million. The previous year's revenue and expenses were a similar percentage of a slightly smaller budget and expenses.

Basically Sherri's basketball program loses about $2 mill per and has done so since she got her big salary increase and those for the coaching staff. Total coaches salaries are approximately $1.5 mill per year.


https://oklahoma.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1519969

http://newsok.com/oklahoma-womens-b...n-a-coach-shes-an-icon-for-ou/article/3940609

The second link above by Berry Tramel dated March 2014 states that the women's basketball program lost $3.1 million dollars. I do not know his sources but he is publishing the data.

It should be noted that men's basketball lost similar money although both revenue and expenses were significantly larger.
 
Last edited:
You have a roster full of freshmen and sophomores, including a freshman and two sophomores in the starting line up.

You're currently the second best team in the best conference in the nation.

There are eight other Big 12 teams who wish they sucked as bad as OU right now. :ez-laugh:

Mgood, I'm totally with you. OU is in astonishing shape compared to where they were last year at this time.

I've been watching a slag game between #13 MSU at #10 Kentucky, and it's a three point game with a minute left in OT.

In my opinion either of those SEC teams would have lost yesterday at home against OU by more than 10, and probably more than 40 against Baylor.

After watching a bunch of Big 12 games, I don't need propaganda to change what I already know.
 
I can't imagine Oklahoma Women's basketball without Sherri Coale as their coach. Love our team this year.....So we lost a game....Whatever!!! We've got a GREAT bunch of girls on this team.....Enjoy them!!! Can't wait for the next game....We will be fine!!!!
 
In the slag game, #10 KY beat #13 MSU by 2 in 2OT's.

Whoopie doopie.
 
I can't imagine Oklahoma Women's basketball without Sherri Coale as their coach. Love our team this year.....So we lost a game....Whatever!!! We've got a GREAT bunch of girls on this team.....Enjoy them!!! Can't wait for the next game....We will be fine!!!!

:)
 
OU's women's program is pretty much in the black. All 15 scholarships (Sherri's never had 15 scholarship players) are endowed in perpetuity, and OU isn't a program that runs crazy on spending.

Some of her fund-raising goes to the athletic department, a larger part goes to the University. She raises literally millions of dollars every year.

P.S. Give me time and I'll give you multiple links. Just not tonight...

Very INcorrect. USA Today and several others posted that information about a year ago and I believe UConn was the ONLY women's program in the black. OU's was about 1.4 million in the RED and they did say that was with the scholly's being endowed. So get the info correct when you post.
 
OOPS, it was actually 2.1 million loss last year. Yes the scholly's are endowed BUT the coaches salary's travel and all other expenses are WAY above what is brought in, which is not much.

So again, Sherri IS a good coach but NOT a great coach. And for sure, as my original argument says, not a coach worth a million per year. Not as driven as she used to be, doesn't recruit as hard or coach as hard. This game is still like all others as Switzer has always said, It's not the X's and O's it's the Jimmy's and Joe's (or Gina's and Jane's). So when Sherri was getting to 10 players, she was making final fours. Not doing that anymore and that is lack of effort and motivation - she is Comfortable.

Also YCN, please provide ANY proof of OTHER fund raising activities she has done. I Doubt there are very many as she is busy with, or shoud be, her job.
 
Oklahoma Announces Statewide Fundraiser for Kay Yow Cancer Fund

Title IX Turns 40! Celebration dinner w/Sherri Coale

Holiday Fundraiser

Sherri Coale's Q rating soars

Children's house takes forefront at Coaches Lunch

OFE news release

Coale gets UN Peace Award nomination

Sherri Coale Selected for Oklahoma Women's Hall of Fame Induction

see Event of the Month: Sherri Coale Fundraiser (PDF)

OU Fastbreak Club Newsletter (PDF)

TEAMFOX for Parkinson's Research

Sherri's fundraising efforts are truly legendary, and yes, many of them bring money to OU and the Athletic Department. There are so many links out there when you search for "Sherri Coale" Fundraiser that you can't find what you want because of the vast array of fundraising that she does!

JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY SENATE

Quote from the link just above:

Prof. Brown asked Mr. Castiglione about the coaches’ raises. Mr. Castiglione replied that OU is in a unique environment, especially with a successful athletics program. The reason we are having success is because we have been able to generate the revenue necessary to best package our program. In many cases, our coaches are considered the best in the business. If we ignore the market place, then we have a problem with retention. Our coaches are the reason why the program is self-sustaining. The compensation of the coaches is commensurate with the market, their performance, and how their teams do overall. The increase in compensation is paid from sources that would not be possible without their success. It comes from radio and television, corporate sponsorship, and licensing revenue. At the same time, we have to navigate a difficult journey because many of the staff will not get raises, just like the rest of the campus. It is important to keep the people who are creating success and, when possible, to share the success with the rest of the campus, such as with the academic enhancement fee and the endowment that was created several years ago for the University library. In the last month, Sam Bradford, Coach Sherri Coale and Coach Bob Stoops were on the cover of magazines. The student-athletes and coaches profoundly impact our state.

Prof. Forman noted that a lot of money comes the University’s way when we go to a playoff or bowl game. However, the Athletics Department takes quite a few people on the trips, which is expensive. Mr. Castiglione said the travel size reflects the type of bowl. A travel allowance is put in place by the conference, and it is larger for a BCS bowl. For the Athletics Department, it is a business trip. They have to move their operations to another city for eight or nine days. It is very expensive to move the players, coaches and their families, support staff, University delegation, and the marching band. A budget is set aside, and it is the Athletics Department’s job to stay within the budget. The department does it in a cost-efficient way but still makes it a first-class experience for student-athletes, because they got us there, they deserve the reward, and hopefully it puts them in a great position to win the game.

Prof. Muraleetharan pointed out that another tangible benefit of having a successful athletics program is it makes fundraising easier for the University. Mr. Castiglione said there is some debate on whether a successful athletics program has an effect on institutional fundraising and admissions applications. A good athletics program is like a high tide in the harbor: it can raise all the boats. Perhaps the program can bring recognition and visibility to the University. The program’s mission is to be successful but also to stay true to its core values.

Prof. Bass asked whether the coaches would again pledge financial support for the library. Mr. Castiglione said he could not speak for them. However, a number of the coaches help the campus and the community in many ways and do it without a lot of publicity. It is their choice whether they support the library or something else.
 
Oklahoma Announces Statewide Fundraiser for Kay Yow Cancer Fund

Title IX Turns 40! Celebration dinner w/Sherri Coale

Holiday Fundraiser

Sherri Coale's Q rating soars

Children's house takes forefront at Coaches Lunch

OFE news release

Coale gets UN Peace Award nomination

Sherri Coale Selected for Oklahoma Women's Hall of Fame Induction

see Event of the Month: Sherri Coale Fundraiser (PDF)

OU Fastbreak Club Newsletter (PDF)

TEAMFOX for Parkinson's Research

Sherri's fundraising efforts are truly legendary, and yes, many of them bring money to OU and the Athletic Department. There are so many links out there when you search for "Sherri Coale" Fundraiser that you can't find what you want because of the vast array of fundraising that she does!

JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY SENATE

Quote from the link just above:

I'm sure she probably sits in on meetings, luncheons, etc to assist their fund development arm of the university, but what you've listed...more than likely, she is paid for those appearances to help other organizations raise funds.

http://www.brooksinternational.com/SherriCoale_512.htm

http://www.allamericanspeakers.com/speakerbio/Sherri_Coale.php
 
I have no doubt that the numbers are fudged nationwide to make college sports look less lucrative. Example: That OU t-shirt? Clearly an academic venture that supports the academic side of academia and has nothing to do with sports. ;)

That said, we do invest a lot in our WBB program and I have no doubt that it runs in the red like most... but I don't think it's for a lack of fan support or coach fundraising, but rather, because we want to be one of the best.
 
I have no doubt that the numbers are fudged nationwide to make college sports look less lucrative. Example: That OU t-shirt? Clearly an academic venture that supports the academic side of academia and has nothing to do with sports. ;)

That said, we do invest a lot in our WBB program and I have no doubt that it runs in the red like most... but I don't think it's for a lack of fan support or coach fundraising, but rather, because we want to be one of the best.

Every athletic program on campus runs in the red except for football. I think men's basketball used to be in the black during Tubbs/Sampson days but with Lon's salary and all the marketing costs and discounted tickets trying to generate butts in the seats has it in the red as well.
 
http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2015/01/college-endowment-.html
http://www.ask.com/wiki/List_of_colleges_and_universities_in_the_United_States_by_endowment?lang=en

Let's see. Harvard has by far the largest endowment of any American university. Yale has fallen to third behind the University of Texas System (note the word system). The last time I saw a numerical ranking, OU was about 45th.
Our endowment is around a billion. Harvard has about 34 billion.

How much of that is due to the Harvard football team?

It was a way to get OU off the ground. We may wish, and I'm not so sure that Boren isn't looking at this, to examine how we approach endowments to the University.
 
http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2015/01/college-endowment-.html
http://www.ask.com/wiki/List_of_colleges_and_universities_in_the_United_States_by_endowment?lang=en

Let's see. Harvard has by far the largest endowment of any American university. Yale has fallen to third behind the University of Texas System (note the word system). The last time I saw a numerical ranking, OU was about 45th.
Our endowment is around a billion. Harvard has about 34 billion.

How much of that is due to the Harvard football team?

It was a way to get OU off the ground. We may wish, and I'm not so sure that Boren isn't looking at this, to examine how we approach endowments to the University.


Per the link you provided this link list OU at #62 with $1,493,000 which would put OU right at +,- #25 among public universities. An outstanding accomplishment for David Boren and the university.

Not something that can be proved but the football programs bringing alumni on campus more frequently has to aid keeping in contact with the money people and increase endowments to all parts of the university. This logic would apply to all athletic programs to an infinitely smaller degree because of the numbers that attend games is significantly less. No question Sherri helps benefit these successes.


http://chronicle.com/article/Sortable-Table-College-and/151417/
 
Last edited:
Just realize that the vast portion of OU's shortfall in women's basketball comes from the practice of prorating the costs of athletic operations and facilities, including facilities upgrades and replacement, across all sports. Whatever the basis is varies from school to school, but this is a common practice for university athletic departments. If OU shows a 3.1 million deficit, probably well over 2 million comes from being assessed costs for facilities that they don't even need or use.

That's just the way it is.

P.S. It's also one of the ways schools use to hide the true costs of their football programs...
 
Back
Top