There's also this question (to which I don't pretend to have an answer): If he acts like this with his players in the spotlight of March Madness, how rough is he on them in private?
Bobby Knight had lots of defenders too, including on this board, and sorry, he crossed the line many times, pure and simple.
It's also ironic how viewpoints can change. When many fans were calling for Mike Stoops' return to OU, his passion and fire and willingness to chew players out was cited as something we needed.
But then, once it was clear he was not a quick fix and our defense was struggling, he was suddenly painted by many of those same fans as a nutjob whose antics with players were indefensible. I suspect that if the results on the field had been better, no one would have had a problem with his interactions with players.
SVP actually goes so far as to state that the player being yelled had no problem with his treatment -- the same defense was frequently made of Knight -- but honestly, what freshman is going to come out and say, especially during the NCAA tourney, that he has a problem with the way his coach is treating him?
Abused wives often appear devoted to their husbands, too, in public, and they certainly don't speak out against them--until the day comes when they finally get the courage and strength to break away from their abuser.
Please note: I'm not comparing Izzo to an abusive husband. But "Hey, the kid had no problem with it" doesn't fly. Maybe the kid didn't have a problem with it; that's entirely possible. But it's also possible he did but felt he'd be putting his own and his team's prospects at risk if he said anything.
Also, one can think Izzo (or any coach) crosses the line at times, and still not be at the other extreme -- that everything should be made easy for everyone all the time. There's a huge area in between. That's the biggest fallacy in SVP's remarks, in my opinion.