Why is basketball your favorite OU sport?

I've asked this a couple times, and haven't gotten an answer.....how many one-and-done kids wore there last year? How about the year before?

I have a hard time believing that number is high enough that it is the main reason college basketball is "down".
 
Look at the stands... The one and done rule is not allowing for teams to develop

While I would agree about the one and done rule, that's not the primary reason attendance is down. Here's an article where Bowlsby comments on attendance in football and basketball:


Big 12 football: Fan attendance concerns Bowlsby
Posted by Berry Tramel on March 5, 2013 at 3:30 pm

In general, the Big 12 draws well at the gate for football and men’s basketball. But that doesn’t mean attendance isn’t a Big 12 issue. Commissioner Bob Bowlsby has his eye on the long-term trends of fan attendance.

“We don’t see it much,” Bowlsby said of declining attendance. “Our league in general draws well. But football and basketball (nationally) have declined five years in a row.”
And part of that, Bowlsby said, is all the ways you can see a game now. Not just on television, but on mobile devices.

“The remote engagement that is now possible … six hours is an eternity for today’s college students to go to a football game. They’ve got a dozen things, all going on at once.”
Bowlsby acknowledges what has been feared and suggested since the advent of television but perhaps only now is coming to fruition.

“In some measure, we are in competition with our own initiatives,” Bowlsby said. “We have put together television packages that have been made so available, so affordable, so quality, people are staying away.”

Here are Bowlsby thoughts on the issue:

* “College kids want the game time to be at 7 p.m. so they can party all day. Young families, they’ve got Pop Warner football and activities, so they want later in the afternoon. Older folks, they want us to ply at 1 o’clock in the afternoon and don’t understand why we just don’t tell TV people to go to hell.”

But here’s why. Bowlsby said 50 percent of Big 12 schools’ revenues come from media contracts. His first year as athletic director at Iowa, 1990, that figure was a little over 10 percent.

* Sporting venues will have to change.

“It’s the comparison of live vs. your living room,” Bowlsby said. “Where will it go? (Home,) it’s a comfy seat. Don’t have to wait in any lines. Restrooms are always there for you. Got a 50-yard line seat. We better be figuring out a way to give you something at the stadium that you can’t get at home.”

* Ticket sales and attendance are not the same thing, which OU and OSU basketball have learned over the last decade or so.

“Tomorrow’s fans are not buying season tickets and attending every game,” Bowlsby said. “They’re buying season tickets and cherry-picking.”

* NFL football fosters great fan passion even for those who never enter a stadium. Bowlsby said 17 percent of people who identify themselves as fans of the NFL say they have attended a game in the last five years.

“It’s a made for television sport,” Bowlsby said. “College sports never has been.”

* “Generally speaking, I think we’re going to end up with smaller venues,” Bowlsby said.

* Technology in stadiums has to keep up. “Make sure every stadium has wifi capabilities,” Bowlsby said. “It’s an expensive undertaking.”

When Bowlsby was athletic director at Stanford a few years ago, the university decided to make Stanford Stadium wifi accessible. Stanford officials estimated that 20 percent of the crowd would use the service. On the first game, 48 percent of the fans used the wifi, and the system crashed. “The Stanford population wanted to be more involved than we thought,” Bowlsby said. “The world is changing.”

* Big 12 officials are taking steps. Those insufferably long timeouts, when an official with a red arm band stands on the field signaling that a television commercial is still running? Bowlsby said paying customers must be better served during that time.

“We’re looking at bringing in live feeds from other venues, show you not just highlights, but live feeds,” Bowlsby said.

* Pricing always is an issue.

“That’s another thing we need to spend some time on,” he said. “There is a resistance point for students and the general public: $25 to park, $85 ticket or more, $6 hot dog, $4 bottle of water, make a contribution to get a better seat. That Saturday is not really inexpensive.”

* Bowlsby said schools can’t always count on philanthropic dollars.

“The donor model is changing,” Bowlsby said. “Time will tell if the same kind of proceeds can be derived going forward.”
 
It's hard for me to pick a favorite between football and basketball; however, basketball to me is so exciting. The momentum and the ups/downs of a single game are enormous in basketball. With football, especially if the teams are huddling every play, there is down time in between plays and you get a chance to catch your breath. Sometimes, with basketball, it is great play after great play. You can live and die with made/missed shots in basketball during a big game.

That's not to say that football isn't exciting or that I don't love it.

I also like the fact that I can just go to the gym and shoot a basketball. It's not fun to throw a football by yourself.
 
I've asked this a couple times, and haven't gotten an answer.....how many one-and-done kids wore there last year? How about the year before?

I have a hard time believing that number is high enough that it is the main reason college basketball is "down".


It most definitely has an impact. Let's go back 30 years. I'll list 10 of the best players in college basketball. Compare them to 10 of the best this year and you're not going to like the results.

Wayman Tisdale, Michael Jordan (only an OU fan would think of Tisdale before Jordan :dance005:), Hakeem Olajuwon, Patrick Ewing, Clyde Drexler, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone, John Stockton, Chris Mullin, and Ralph Sampson.

To answer the question in the thread title, I can't say OU basketball is more important to me than OU football or vice versa. I really follow both as closely as I can.
 
Last edited:
I've asked this a couple times, and haven't gotten an answer.....how many one-and-done kids wore there last year? How about the year before?

I have a hard time believing that number is high enough that it is the main reason college basketball is "down".
By my count, there were 10 last year (9 D1, 1 juco) and 9 in 2011 (8 D1, 1 juco).

I'm finding it harder and harder to watch college basketball, but I don't think it has much to do with one-and-done kids. If anything, I'm more likely to watch a game if such a player is featured.
 

I just want to point out that ever since 04 stopped posting on SF.com, the mens team hasn't been in the postseason :(

The womens team is my favorite since I did the pep band for four years, including traveling with the team for Big 12 and NCAA tournaments.

I did the same for football, but football has enough Sooner fans making them their top team I think :)
 
It most definitely has an impact. Let's go back 30 years. I'll list 10 of the best players in college basketball. Compare them to 10 of the best this year and you're not going to like the results.

Wayman Tisdale, Michael Jordan (only an OU fan would think of Tisdale before Jordan :dance005:), Hakeem Olajuwon, Patrick Ewing, Clyde Drexler, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone, John Stockton, Chris Mullin, and Ralph Sampson.

To answer the question in the thread title, I can't say OU basketball is more important to me than OU football or vice versa. I really follow both as closely as I can.
1983 is a really extreme example, both for the rare collection of talent that particular year and the fact that you reached back 30 years to look at the effect of a rule that was established 8 years ago. Even if you just go back 10 (2003) or 20 years (1993, before anyone was leaving after one year of college, let alone making the jump out of high school), you're not going to find a collection of players comparable to that 1983 group.

You may have a valid argument, but cherry-picking an example from 30 years ago isn't bolstering it.
 
I don't have it in front of me but besides Jordan and Wayman did any of those others leave early?

And why not put Wayman up there? His Airness didn't make AA his freshman year.
 
1983 is a really extreme example, both for the rare collection of talent that particular year and the fact that you reached back 30 years to look at the effect of a rule that was established 8 years ago. Even if you just go back 10 (2003) or 20 years (1993, before anyone was leaving after one year of college, let alone making the jump out of high school), you're not going to find a collection of players comparable to that 1983 group.

You may have a valid argument, but cherry-picking an example from 30 years ago isn't bolstering it.

I picked 30 years ago because I wanted to include Wayman. If I picked 20 or 40, the results are similar. If I went back 40 years, I'd have the likes of Bill Walton, Doug Collins, George McGuiness, Jamaal Wilkes, Maurice Lucas, David Thompson, Alvin Adams (Boomer!), World B Free, Ernie D and Bobby Jones.

That list is not as impressive as 30 years ago, but it still obliterates the best of today in college basketball.
 
The reason I enjoy OU basketball the most, would be due to all the exciting times it brought me growing up. We sucked at football in the 90's and were never on TV. Plus the fact that basketball is fast paced, and you are never really out of a game.
 
I picked 30 years ago because I wanted to include Wayman.
Again, that's hardly relevant when you're trying to attribute causation to a rule that was put in place in the 2005 NBA collective bargaining agreement.

If I picked 20 or 40, the results are similar.
No, they're not.

That list is not as impressive as 30 years ago, but it still obliterates the best of today in college basketball.
That has nothing to do with the one-and-done rule.

Your argument was about the effect of the one-and-done rule. You're implying that the pool of talent in college basketball in 2013 would somehow be comparable to what it was in 1983 if not for the one-and-done rule. Attributing the talent disparity between those two years to the one-and-done rule ignores two major things:

1) The number of elite players varies greatly from one class to the next (and subsequently from one four-year block to the next. 1983 was an aberration.

2) Most elite players were leaving college early or bypassing it altogether at a prolific rate prior to the rule (this is the cause of the one-and-done rule, not the effect of it!). In other words, the pool of top-level college talent was already being depleted at as high, if not higher, of a rate than it is with the one-and-done rule in place. Forcing the next generation of Kobe Bryants and LeBron Jameses to go to college for a year instead of bypassing it altogether isn't killing the talent level of college basketball.
__________________________________________________

30 years ago

Hall of Famers that played in college in 1982-83:
Ralph Sampson (Sr)
Clyde Drexler (Jr)
Hakeem Olajuwon (So)
Michael Jordan (So)
Charles Barkley (So)
John Stockton (Jr)
Patrick Ewing (So)
Chris Mullin (So)
Karl Malone (Fr)
Joe Dumars (So)

Non-Hall of Fame players that made multiple All-NBA teams:
Mark Price (Fr) (4x All-NBA)

Hall of Famers that would have been in college in 1982-83 had they not left early:
James Worthy
Dominique Wilkins
Isiah Thomas

That's 10 Hall of Famers that actually played college ball that year, or a total of 13 if everyone played four years. That is highly unusual, as you will see.
__________________________________________________

20 years ago

No one that played college ball in 1992-93 is in the Hall of Fame yet, but
here is the list of players that made multiple All-NBA teams:
Chris Webber (So) (5x All-NBA)
Anfernee Hardaway (Jr)
Vin Baker (Sr)
Jason Kidd (Fr)
Grant Hill (Jr)
Steve Nash (Fr)

Multiple All-NBA team players that would have been in college in 1992-93 had they not left early:
Shaq

That's four potential Hall of Famers that actually played college ball that year, or a total of five if everyone played four years. That's nowhere close to the numbers for 1982-83.

This is more than a decade before the one-and-done rule and two years before Kevin Garnett ignites the prep-to-pros movement, so you can't make the one-and-done rule your scapegoat for this talent drop.
__________________________________________________

10 years ago

No one that played college ball in 2002-03 is in the Hall of Fame yet, but
here is the list of players that made multiple All-NBA teams:
Carmelo Anthony (Fr)
Chris Bosh (Fr)
Dwyane Wade (Jr)
Deron Williams (Fr)
Brandon Roy (Fr)

Multiple All-NBA team players that would have been in college in 2002-03 had they not left early/bypassed college:
Gilbert Arenas
Amar'e Stoudemire
__________________________________________________

2013

Here is the list of drafted players that would be playing college basketball this season if everyone stayed four years:
John Wall
Derrick Favors
DeMarcus Cousins
Xavier Henry
Eric Bledsoe
Avery Bradley
Daniel Orton
Hassan Whiteside
Lance Stephenson
Kyrie Irving
Derrick Williams
Enes Kanter
Tristan Thompson
Brandon Knight
Alec Burks
Kawhi Leonard
Tobias Harris
Jordan Hamilton
Cory Joseph
Tyler Honeycutt
Jordan Williams
Darius Morris
Josh Selby

Every non-senior, non-international player in the 2012 draft and obviously everyone actually playing in college this year

So back to my first point: 1) The number of elite players varies greatly from one class to the next (and subsequently from one four-year block to the next

Look at the list of 2013-eligible players and consider this: if everyone played four years of college ball, how many future Hall of Famers do you think are playing in 2013? We're not fortune-tellers, and there may be a few surprises, but no reasonable person can name 10-13 of them that are potential Hall of Famers.

And back to my second point: 2) Most elite players were leaving college early or bypassing it altogether at a prolific rate prior to the rule

How many of these players do you think would have stayed in college longer than they did if the NBA had never established the one-and-done rule? How many of them would have skipped college altogether?

Making the one-and-done rule a scapegoat ignores the drastic changes in the basketball landscape in the last 30 years.
 
Back
Top