Dem Coltz
New member
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2010
- Messages
- 447
- Reaction score
- 0
I remember this summer when the assistant coaches were announced, and pretty much everyone was surprised that no "name" assistant or HC from another program was hired. Then a lot of people got defensive about the hires and conversation got squashed as people took sides for or against. Looking at it now, although it's very early, is there a consensus on why these were the people hired for very important jobs? Do they deserve to be asst's at this level or not, and is this causing a problem for this season and our near future? Does anyone think there would be a huge difference in our play this year had we gotten an established quality assistant? Or were these the only people that could be convinced to jump onboard a perceived sinking ship? How much of our season is going to depend on what these guys can or cannot do?