Blowout losses under Capel

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wasn't the one who started it "genius". I am calm. If you don't agree that 13 points is getting spanked, get off the thread. Go post on the obligatory moral victory aka "this is what we wanted" threads. Peace.
 
Last edited:
jessegl25 said:
I wasn't the one who starting. I am calm. If you don't agree that 13 points is getting spanked, get off the thread. Go post on the obligatory moral victory aka "this is what we wanted" threads. Peace.
Click to expand...

No thanks.
 
jessegl25, Myself and the other mods will decide when someone needs to get off a thread. If you say something like what you said to soonerbounce to another poster you will be banned
 
The Notorious L.N.C. said:
jessegl25, Myself and the other mods wil ldecide when someone needs to get off a thread. If you say something like waht you said to soonerbounces to anthoer poster you will be banned
Click to expand...

He's allowed to sarcastically call me a genius? It's a two way street. He attacks my lack of intelligence (definitely his opinion) and I attack his manhood. Basically the same thing. Ban if you must.
 
capelfan52 said:
I guess. Thats the problem with this list. Some of these games were two possession games with less than 5 minutes left and ended up being 10 point losses, yet you call them blowouts.

To me, a blowout is a 20-point game, or at least there's a 20-point lead at some point in the game.
Click to expand...

The same criteria is being used for Sampson & Tubbs, do you think some of their losses of 10+ points were closer for much of the game? I do, so in that respect the camparisions are completely legitimate.
 
StatGeek said:
The same criteria is being used for Sampson & Tubbs, do you think some of their losses of 10+ points were closer for much of the game? I do, so in that respect the camparisions are completely legitimate.
Click to expand...

comparisons sure. but blowouts no.
 
OU was toyed with a little bit... They never led, Baylor played pretty bad, gave up 27 points on turnovers, and it turned into an absolute dunk fest late in the game and they blew it open when they really needed to. OU was never a threat to win that game.

Is it a blowout? Probably not. But, we are using the same criteria to determine blowouts (double digit losses) for Capel as people have done for Sampson and Tubbs, so it should go in that category for the purposes we are using it for.
 
jessegl25 said:
He's allowed to sarcastically call me a genius? It's a two way street. He attacks my lack of intelligence (definitely his opinion) and I attack his manhood. Basically the same thing. Ban if you must.
Click to expand...

Seriously man I don't know what your problem is but your act on here is getting old.
 
I apologize for calling you a genius. I retract my comment that you are a genius
 
seniorsooner said:
There are times when games go to overtime and one team ends up winning by 10+. By your criteria, that would be a "blowout". Me thinks your criteria is a bit too black and white.
Click to expand...

You guys are arguing over semantics, whether you define the loss as a close game, blowout, or in between makes no difference. The fact still remains that we lose by 10+ points quite frequently.
 
StatGeek said:
You guys are arguing over semantics, whether you define the loss as a close game, blowout, or in between makes no difference. The fact still remains that we lose by 10+ points quite frequently.
Click to expand...

Like I said, it was not my idea to figure up how many 10+ losses was attributed to Capel. I took the idea and ran with it. Everyone arguing about how they think the word blowout should be defined. It's really no big deal. I think a 13 point loss is a blowout, some don't. The criteria is the criteria. I'm getting slammed by mods and some guy I don't care to know about their definitions. "Your act is getting old"...I haven't been on here long enough to develop an act, but okay.
 
jessegl25 said:
Like I said, it was not my idea to figure up how many 10+ losses was attributed to Capel. I took the idea and ran with it. Everyone arguing about how they think the word blowout should be defined. It's really no big deal. I think a 13 point loss is a blowout, some don't. The criteria is the criteria. I'm getting slammed by mods and some guy I don't care to know about their definitions. "Your act is getting old"...I haven't been on here long enough to develop an act, but okay.
Click to expand...

Hang in there, Jesse.
 
jessegl25 said:
Like I said, it was not my idea to figure up how many 10+ losses was attributed to Capel. I took the idea and ran with it. Everyone arguing about how they think the word blowout should be defined. It's really no big deal. I think a 13 point loss is a blowout, some don't. The criteria is the criteria. I'm getting slammed by mods and some guy I don't care to know about their definitions. "Your act is getting old"...I haven't been on here long enough to develop an act, but okay.
Click to expand...
No you are developing a common theme of attacking posters who disagree with your stance. That or the credentials stance that you used in a thread a few months back. Add in the whole gay thread that went down last week and its fairly obvious you have an act on here and that act is being disrespectful.

I don't what your problem is that makes you so disrespectful on here to people but its getting old.
 
Ok I'll leave the board. Fine with me. Later gals.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

TEvans4Three
Sooners' Tournament Resume
2
Replies
27
Views
1K
TEvans4Three
TEvans4Three
StoopsBros
'24 Coaching Carousel Thread
62 63 64
Replies
1K
Views
41K
SoonerBounce13
SoonerBounce13
BoulderSooner
Bubble Watch catch all ..
29 30 31
Replies
600
Views
39K
hoopsaustin
hoopsaustin
S
Thanksgiving Day Games
Replies
6
Views
2K
sybarite
S
S
Big Twelve
Replies
1
Views
2K
sybarite
S
Back
Top