well ... I dont want it to appear that I wouldnt welcome a kid like that. I certainly would. But I'd take Hollis Price's contribution to this program over that of Trae's.
well ... I dont want it to appear that I wouldnt welcome a kid like that. I certainly would. But I'd take Hollis Price's contribution to this program over that of Trae's.
well ... I dont want it to appear that I wouldnt welcome a kid like that. I certainly would. But I'd take Hollis Price's contribution to this program over that of Trae's.
On the court - 100% agree, but Trae's value to the program goes well beyond what he did on the court.
His, likely, financial contributions aside, the publicity and track record of showing kids you can be a one-and-done kid at OU are hard to quantify. I often equate on the court success with overall program success, but there is more too it than what happens on the court.
Having Blake (2 years) and Trae in the league is big for OU - just look at the practice facility as an example.