Storm,
Just curious... but would you say your views line up with the content on the official libertarian party website? The reason I ask that question is some friends of mine who are libertarian, and some of them reviewed the site and said yes, it aligns with their world-view, others have said partially. A few of my libertarian friends basically track their world-view back to Ayn Rand, so you can imagine the heated discussions I have with them!
I consider myself a consitutionalist/originalist first and a libertarian second. That is why I label it that way. I believe in the original founding document and also believe that its authors were borderline genius in the way they constructed it. They were forming a country to get away from an oppressive, tyrannical situation. And they strategically designed a balance of power into three branches so that one branch could be "kept in check" by the other two. They knew this process would also create gridlock and that gov't expansion would be slow and incremental (or at least that was their intention). They also recognized the invaluable nature of individual rights and what it's like to get those rights trampled.....they lived it.
The Libertarian website states many principles that I agree with.....by and large (self ownership, privacy, etc.), but some stances I disagree with. TLP wants to abolish the death penalty (I don't). They also want to repeal laws that criminalize "victimless crimes" like recreational drug use. The only problem with that is, in many instances, drug use isn't a victimless crime when the addict is engaging in criminal behavior (theft, etc.) in order to procure money to buy their drugs. TLP is a little too "black/white" on some things that obviously need more context.
I guess I agree with the Milton Freidman's view of Rand...."an utterly intolerant and dogmatic person who did a great deal of good". By and large, I'm for less government in most situations......"the bigger the government, the smaller the individual". I also depart from some libertarians on foreign policy because this country does have interests globally that we need to protect. I'm not an isolationist (Ron Paul, Pat Buchanan, Ross Perot), but I do understand that worldview and why they are sympathetic to it.
But I also understand the importance of some government, for example a safety net (to varying degrees) for society's most vulnerable (elderly, disabled, lower income children, etc.).
As far as websites, I do read some things on Cato, but for the most part, I view an issue and make up my own mind.