Can you guys explain some Trump things to me?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Absolutely!

We need to do a better job of teaching our kids the difference between selfishness and independence. Too many people seem to think they are interchangeable.

I dont know that it's a teaching thing. It's an internal narrative issue that seems to rely on what was used for ones' sense of security. I know experience can make a difference but how that threshold is reached is another story. it may go all the way back to maternal bonding.

Some people are ready to make that leap and some aren't. How they got there I dont know. I know we all start off as ME thinkers and then some become we thinkers and some dont. I think it's a matter of your internal narrative giving you enough objectivity and independence. That's really dependent on the first 2 years then up to the 7th year of life.
 
Defend it, people.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1274748265376907265

https://twitter.com/i/status/1276146084281229313

https://twitter.com/i/status/1276247942647574528

https://twitter.com/i/status/1275952697607221248

Whatever spell Trump has cast over people is lifting..... Pieces are starting to fall. It was HYSTERICAL on Fox the other night, when Hannity asked him point blank about Biden and Cuban throws in his support for Biden.

Carly Fiorina, who was a GOP candidate, now supporting Biden. More and more conservatives are coming out against these lunatic.

The ad with The Obamassiah was especially entertaining. Every characteristic he mentioned is practiced by the left. I took it as reasons to vote for President Trump.

Thanks. That helped solidify my vote for President Trump even more (as if...)!
 
Remember when he called it the China Virus.....

People were like, "man, I am pretty sure he says that to blame China, or in a racist way"..

Trumpers were like.... "no! That's ridiculous. It's just an accurate way to describe the virus. It's a virus, it's from China"

Then Trump starts calling it the "Kung Flu"

And people were like, "ok..... China Virus has now turned into the Kung Flu... Can we now agree he's using it with ill intent and in a way that is offensive? Seems pretty obvious at this point"

Trumpers then are like, "OMG, who cares what he calls it! It's a virus, who cares what someone calls it!"

I'm just sick and tired of the ignorance of placing money over life. Money isn't real. We made it up. We can make more. Life? Once that person is gone they don't come back. Life is more precious than money or patriotism or whatever heuristic concept they wanna goose-step to in their misguided ventures.
 
Remember when he called it the China Virus.....

People were like, "man, I am pretty sure he says that to blame China, or in a racist way"..

Trumpers were like.... "no! That's ridiculous. It's just an accurate way to describe the virus. It's a virus, it's from China"

Then Trump starts calling it the "Kung Flu"

And people were like, "ok..... China Virus has now turned into the Kung Flu... Can we now agree he's using it with ill intent and in a way that is offensive? Seems pretty obvious at this point"

Trumpers then are like, "OMG, who cares what he calls it! It's a virus, who cares what someone calls it!"
I still call it the China virus. They are responsible for it.

Why is this an issue? Just to deflect
 
I wonder if they can find the time to be offended by the "Saharan dust storm."

If Trump calls it that, the radical left will be all over it in a heartbeat.

I couldn’t help but laugh when I read ABD’s latest complaint. Who gives a rat’s rear end what Trump calls the virus from Wuhan, China? ABD must be running out of material! :ez-laugh:
 
I still call it the China virus. They are responsible for it.

Why is this an issue? Just to deflect

Calling it the Kung Flu is an issue for the following reason:

1.) It's immature
2.) It's unbecoming of a President to use such dumb language
3.) It's a racial stereotype
4.) It's also an attempt to continue downplaying the virus that is now about to ravage the country again a second time
5.) It's purely political.

You know, one of the reasons people claimed to like Trump originally was because he wasn't a regular politician.... For someone who isn't a regular politician, it's pretty amazing that damn near everything he does and says is to pander to his base. He's not a "get it done" kinda guy that you were hoping for. He plays politics and campaigns politically nearly 24/7.
 
If Trump calls it that, the radical left will be all over it in a heartbeat.

I couldn’t help but laugh when I read ABD’s latest complaint. Who gives a rat’s rear end what Trump calls the virus from Wuhan, China? ABD must be running out of material! :ez-laugh:

While they nourish themselves with Canadian bacon and Danish pastry.
 
While they nourish themselves with Canadian bacon and Danish pastry.

I like how you guys are going with "big, whats the problem with calling it the China Virus?" in your responses to me here... completely dodging the Kung Flu part.
 
I like how you guys are going with "big, whats the problem with calling it the China Virus?" in your responses to me here... completely dodging the Kung Flu part.


Less sissy behavior equates to less jabs.
 
Last edited:
Calling it the Kung Flu is an issue for the following reason:

1.) It's immature
2.) It's unbecoming of a President to use such dumb language
3.) It's a racial stereotype
4.) It's also an attempt to continue downplaying the virus that is now about to ravage the country again a second time
5.) It's purely political.

You know, one of the reasons people claimed to like Trump originally was because he wasn't a regular politician.... For someone who isn't a regular politician, it's pretty amazing that damn near everything he does and says is to pander to his base. He's not a "get it done" kinda guy that you were hoping for. He plays politics and campaigns politically nearly 24/7.

Is it unbecoming of a president to spy on an incoming administration during the transition of power?
Is it unbecoming of a president to engage and direct criminal behavior?
Is it unbecoming of a president, VP, and other political leaders to engage in false prosecutions and false investigations all based on a lie?

Again, you focus on silly things like this, Kung flu, and get offended and all worked up. Meanwhile, Obama broke the law and should be indicted along with Biden, Susan rice, comey, etc.
schiff conducted a sham investigation and “trial” based on no evidence at all. The left has been in “resist” mode and wasted hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars with nothing to show for it. They’ve been “resisting” to do the jobs they were elected to do. Yet, you’re up in arms about the president saying China virus or Kung flu.

GMAFB.
 
I like how you guys are going with "big, whats the problem with calling it the China Virus?" in your responses to me here... completely dodging the Kung Flu part.

The Kung Flu name is hilarious. If you get upset about that it shows your bias against trump.

Like mic posted above, you guys get caught up in the most trivial crap and let other injustices slide right on by
 
Like mic posted above, you guys get caught up in the most trivial crap and let other injustices slide right on by

Which is very similar to what they are doing with the BLM/anti-cop movement. Taking something that in the grand scheme of things is a tiny problem, while completely ignoring the much larger issues that affect black Americans.
 
Is it unbecoming of a president to spy on an incoming administration during the transition of power?
Is it unbecoming of a president to engage and direct criminal behavior?
Is it unbecoming of a president, VP, and other political leaders to engage in false prosecutions and false investigations all based on a lie?

Again, you focus on silly things like this, Kung flu, and get offended and all worked up. Meanwhile, Obama broke the law and should be indicted along with Biden, Susan rice, comey, etc.
schiff conducted a sham investigation and “trial” based on no evidence at all. The left has been in “resist” mode and wasted hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars with nothing to show for it. They’ve been “resisting” to do the jobs they were elected to do. Yet, you’re up in arms about the president saying China virus or Kung flu.

GMAFB.

Have you ever asked yourself why none of these Fox News, Sean Hannity, Devin Nunes, etc conspiracies every gain any traction? They come up with all these names like Crossfire Hurricane, Fast & Furious, Operation Choke Point, Crossfire Razor, Benghazi (not a codename), etc... Nothing ever happens.

They spent $7 million on the Benghazi investigation (which coincidentally ended the second its political purpose was concluded, the 2016 election) and it lasted more than 2 years.

Nobody ended up in jail... no indictments... no charges... etc. Fox News ran over a thousand evening segments on Benghazi. Republicans were on TV to discuss it 30 times more than Democrats. Your propaganda machine was calling these things the "biggest political conspiracy in history" and what not. Nothing ever comes from this crap.

And you talk about media fairness? You've got prime time hosts of major networks literally campaigning on stage with Donald Trump.

2020-06-29.png


And didn't they seize something like $40 million during the Mueller investigation?

Come on man....
 
Which is very similar to what they are doing with the BLM/anti-cop movement. Taking something that in the grand scheme of things is a tiny problem, while completely ignoring the much larger issues that affect black Americans.

While we can all agree that "black lives matter" in principle, the BLM organization/movement is quite dangerous....and there are so many folks who have just latched onto them without understanding what they are about. Their founders are self-admitted Marxist anarchists. They scoff at the idea of the nuclear family needing to play a prominent role in the lives of African Americans. Just look at their website. To them, it seems only certain black lives matter (those that lose their lives to law enforcement, especially white law enforcement)....otherwise, they couldn't give a rat's ass about African American deaths.

I'm simply echoing what other prominent African American thinkers and authors have said....including Thomas Sowell, Shelby Steele, Walter Williams, Glenn Loury, Coleman Hughes, Claston Bernard, Kathy Barnette, and David Harris Jr. They all provide unique perspectives....compared to the messages we are bombarded with by the mob.
 
While we can all agree that "black lives matter" in principle, the BLM organization/movement is quite dangerous....and there are so many folks who have just latched onto them without understanding what they are about. Their founders are self-admitted Marxist anarchists. They scoff at the idea of the nuclear family needing to play a prominent role in the lives of African Americans. Just look at their website. To them, it seems only certain black lives matter (those that lose their lives to law enforcement, especially white law enforcement)....otherwise, they couldn't give a rat's ass about African American deaths.

I'm simply echoing what other prominent African American thinkers and authors have said....including Thomas Sowell, Shelby Steele, Walter Williams, Glenn Loury, Coleman Hughes, Claston Bernard, Kathy Barnette, and David Harris Jr. They all provide unique perspectives....compared to the messages we are bombarded with by the mob.

I went to their website... I see where they question the family, by saying "We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable."

I don't see anything directly on their page about anarchism or Marxism... Now, I assume you are talking about their leadership's personal views being Marxist. To me that is a legitimate belief system. There are many different variants of the ideology, and that belief in and of itself doesn't make them bad. Now, if they ascribe to overflow capitalism or the govt by force, or through violent revolution, that would be one thing... but if they want to use the peaceful democratic process to achieve certain goals, more power to them.

There are Marxist parties all over world.... Not just in China, Russia, North Korea, Cuba, Vietnam, etc... but in democracies the world over. Look at whats happening in France right now... The Green Party, which is flat out a socialist party, is winning elections all over the country... Marxist parties have representation in parliament/congress in Norway, Japan, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, UK, Iraq, Germany, and many others. Very few are Soviet-style anymore. Really only North Korea is. Others have adapted, including China and Vietnam.

Pretty interesting topic though.
 
Last edited:
I went to their website... I see where they question the family, by saying "We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and “villages” that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable."

I don't see anything directly on their page about anarchism or Marxism... Now, I assume you are talking about their leadership's personal views being Marxist. To me that is a legitimate belief system. There are many different variants of the ideology, and that belief in and of itself doesn't make them bad. Now, if they ascribe to overflow capitalism or the govt by force, or through violent revolution, that would be one thing... but if they want to use the peaceful democratic process to achieve certain goals, more power to them.

There are Marxist parties all over world.... Not just in China, Russia, North Korea, Cuba, Vietnam, etc... but in democracies the world over. Look at whats happening in France right now... The Green Party, which is flat out a socialist party, is winning elections all over the country... Marxist parties have representation in parliament/congress in Norway, Japan, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, UK, Iraq, Germany, and many others. Very few are Soviet-style anymore. Really only North Korea is. Others have adapted, including China and Vietnam.

Pretty interesting topic though.

What stormspencer was likely referring to was this:

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/20...izer-give-me-money-or-well-daniel-greenfield/


My politics are not to the left or right, but a conservative friend of mine sent me the above link...quite disturbing, actually.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top