Yeah, yeah. I get it, but we’re in dire straits. If we hire another loser, that means 3-4 more years of total irrelevance and more fan apathy, if that’s possible.Anyone who thinks there is a proven science to coaching hires is narrow minded and overly simplistic. You cite a tiny sample size and ignore Billy and Kelvin having little to no proven track record. And I just gave you a much larger sample size than the three hires you cite.
Proven coaches can be great. They also can suck. Mid major coaches can be great. They also can suck. Defensive coaches can be great. They also can suck. Offensive coaches can be great. They also can suck. Hard-asses can be great. They also can suck. Player-friendly coaches can be great. They also can suck. It amazes me that people don't understand this concept. If there was a sure-fire, paint-by-numbers formula, no team would ever make a bad hire.
We need a proven winner, not the flavor of the month from the Missouri Valley.