My statement only took into consideration one thing: the assertion that Capel was being blackballed in the DFW, and as such, not one athlete associated with "top" AAU programs in the area would come to OU.
As a reply to that statement, I reasoned that, in general, if OU doesn't significantly raise the level of talent, and if that doesn't result in elevating our national level of exposure; the young men would continue to steer clear of Norman. Obviously, there are MANY more factors that come into play in these decisions - both legal and illegal.
If you want to compare DFW signings to all of these schools, there are many more facets involved in those decisions than simply the coach. I have personal knowledge of one player in the class of 2011, who signed at one of the schools you listed, who doesn't even necessarily like the coach with whom he signed - and to top it off, it was against the input he was receiving from his AAU coach. He signed because he likes the talent and thinks he can make a difference there.
The problem with making generalized statements is, you can typically find singular examples to shoot holes in it. My original statement was in direct refute of a generalized statement that Capel was being blackballed, and as a direct result, not a single DFW player playing with the top AAU programs would end up at OU.
What I'm reiterating here is this: Capel is NOT being blackballed in DFW. If kids are choosing to go elsewhere, it's because of many, MANY reasons - not the least of which is our current lack of talent and national recognition.
Now, if you'd like to debate why UNT, Tech, Baylor, and the rest are signing DFW kids and OU isn't, I'm up for that. But be specific, because in each signing there are specific reasons that particular decision was made. And not a single one that I know of includes anything resembling Capel being blackballed because of the way he's handled a few interpersonal situations in the past.