Sam
New member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2008
- Messages
- 6,081
- Reaction score
- 0
Who is #22 for Team Oklahoma?
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uujSLL6Bo0A[/ame]
Who is #22 for Team Oklahoma?
Did Stevie Clark just have a bad game or does he struggle with tougher competition? Perhaps a little of both?
A scorer by trade, Clark altered his game and played as more of a traditional setup guy the first few days of camp. He set things up, initiated the offense, played defense and kept the ball moving. During the playoffs, Clark's ability as a scorer allowed him to take over offensively as well while he led his team to a camp title.
General context. It was his 1st competition since rehabbing his knee and hammy. He said he was at 100% going in. I was just hoping that he passed the test.
We need a quality recruit like Woodard. We need him from the get go.
He might end up being the best high school point guard we have brought in since I have been following OU basketball in the early 80's (30 years).
I struggle with these types of projections until we see him in a few college games. Maybe he's one of the most well-rounded PGs we've brought in, offense + defense + intangibles + athleticism. I don't think he's great at any one thing but very good at a number of things.
I struggle with these types of projections until we see him in a few college games. Maybe he's one of the most well-rounded PGs we've brought in, offense + defense + intangibles + athleticism. I don't think he's great at any one thing but very good at a number of things.
If you think about it, over these years most of our starting PGs have been JCs. What I said isn't out on as small a limb as you may think. However, I do have high hopes. I think he has chance to be special. Like you said, not great at any one thing but good at almost everything. Give me 13 guys like that and you've got a helluva team.
In addition to having a bad game, Clark was also seen on the sideline throwing up. Sounds like an overall poor night for him.
Looked life Jeff Carroll had a good game.
He might end up being the best high school point guard we have brought in since I have been following OU basketball in the early 80's (30 years).
If he is better than TMG, he is a darn good player. Obviously TMG had attitude issues but that guy could play. The kid shot 42.42% from 3 point range as a freshman. I am sure everyone remembers his cross over. TMG was a waste of talent. If that kid had a good attitude I think he could have made the NBA. He just didn't want to do the hard work.
If he is better than TMG, he is a darn good player. Obviously TMG had attitude issues but that guy could play. The kid shot 42.42% from 3 point range as a freshman. I am sure everyone remembers his cross over. TMG was a waste of talent. If that kid had a good attitude I think he could have made the NBA. He just didn't want to do the hard work.
From all I've heard, Woodard is the anti-TMG. TMG was a one year disappointment. Woodard will probably be a 4 yr starter. We'll see.
I prefer pg's that don't have to score to impact games. If you have other scorers, give the the facilitating pg over the scoring pg any day of the week.