Mulkey. Enjoy!!!

[sybarite]

You can't spend weekend after weekend with a group of people with your kids playing ball together and not develop some level of friendship and regular communication.

Did she take advantage of that. Probably. But maybe she was just being a mom and interacting with other parents about the team and their daughters play.

You have to use some common sense when discussing this particular point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The point is that it represents illegal contact. You are permitted x number of contacts and visits. She skirted around this kind of claiming a "parental privilege exception." Everyone knew what she was doing. It was a deliberate attempt to circumvent NCAA rules that limit the number of visits by having a special dispensation as a parent. Would other coaches have used it?

Do you think this is the first time that a coach has had a kid in the AAU or in highschool? Why is it that they have found a way to avoid such a situation that smacks of illegal visits? Was it effective? Well, as Michelle Voepel and Sally Jenkins noted, four of the five starters on a national title team were on that AAU team. They denoted starters. I haven't checked, but they made the statement, and there were a bunch that made it to Baylor.

Other coaches have avoided even the appearance of illegality. She relished the opportunity to gain a special dispensation advantage.

Now, can we keep the name Kim Mulkey and her minions off the board. We have our own Mulkey coming in, and I'd like the name to become a positive.

 

[tycat947]

The point is that it represents illegal contact. You are permitted x number of contacts and visits. She skirted around this kind of claiming a "parental privilege exception." Everyone knew what she was doing. It was a deliberate attempt to circumvent NCAA rules that limit the number of visits by having a special dispensation as a parent. Would other coaches have used it?

Do you think this is the first time that a coach has had a kid in the AAU or in highschool? Why is it that they have found a way to avoid such a situation that smacks of illegal visits? Was it effective? Well, as Michelle Voepel and Sally Jenkins noted, four of the five starters on a national title team were on that AAU team. They denoted starters. I haven't checked, but they made the statement, and there were a bunch that made it to Baylor.

Other coaches have avoided even the appearance of illegality. She relished the opportunity to gain a special dispensation advantage.

Now, can we keep the name Kim Mulkey and her minions off the board. We have our own Mulkey coming in, and I'd like the name to become a positive.

Exactly! And she's been involved as a coach in NCAA basketball since 1985 (30 years) so she's not a newcomer to the rules!

I totally agree about the name Mulkey!

 

[Oliver Hardy]

You guys are absolutely ridiculous.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[got mulk??]

I sure hope the Irish can shoot an unintentional 3 at the end of the game when they beat Hypocrite U today! Muffett isn't a Sulkey Mulkey fan either. Guess she's mad that Sulkey has beaten her so much! Oh wait! Irish knocked out Hypocrite U last year in the NCAA and going for 2 in a row tonight!

At least we made it to the Elite 8 two years in a row and 4 out of the last 5! When was last time OU made it..............several years ago and may not return!

 

[Sweetest OU Girl]

At least we made it to the Elite 8 two years in a row and 4 out of the last 5! When was last time OU made it..............several years ago and may not return!

Don't let us frustrate you too much. I hope you do well tonight. It is in the best interest of the conference for you to go as far as possible in the tournament.

I'm actually more impressed with your team this year than in past years. You don't have the advantage of the tall superstar, yet have put together a team of really excellent payers to accomplish so much. I think Johnson is the glue that holds the team together. I would love for OU to have a player who could produce assists like she does.

Good luck tonight. We are mostly just frustrated that we finished 2nd in the conference, way ahead of the 3rd place team, but got no reward or respect for that - especially a home court setting for rounds 1 & 2. It was enormously disrespectful toward the entire conference for that to happen.

You guys can make up for that - not so much for us - but for the conference.

 

[got mulk??]

Don't let us frustrate you too much. I hope you do well tonight. It is in the best interest of the conference for you to go as far as possible in the tournament.

I'm actually more impressed with your team this year than in past years. You don't have the advantage of the tall superstar, yet have put together a team of really excellent payers to accomplish so much. I think Johnson is the glue that holds the team together. I would love for OU to have a player who could produce assists like she does.

Good luck tonight. We are mostly just frustrated that we finished 2nd in the conference, way ahead of the 3rd place team, but got no reward or respect for that - especially a home court setting for rounds 1 & 2. It was enormously disrespectful toward the entire conference for that to happen.

You guys can make up for that - not so much for us - but for the conference.

Thanks, but there is only so much Baylor bashing I can take! I understand your frustration and hope we keep taking it to ND!!

 

[tycat947]

Trash Mulkey cussed out her flagrant fouler on national TV! Stay classy, Hypocrite U!

 

[got mulk??]

Keep eating those sour grapes, tycat and Zero U!

 

[tycat947]

Hypocrites and Sulkey go down!

 

[BlackwellSooner]

Thanks, but there is only so much Baylor bashing I can take! I understand your frustration and hope we keep taking it to ND!!

If you don't like it, I doubt that there is anything to keep you from leaving. Does Baylor not have a message board that you can hang out on?

Probably not any Mulkey-bashing going on there, I bet...

 

[MsProudSooner]

If you don't like it, I doubt that there is anything to keep you from leaving. Does Baylor not have a message board that you can hang out on?

Probably not any Mulkey-bashing going on there, I bet...

I dunno about that. I bet there are people on the Baylor board blaming their loss to ND on Mulkey. :ez-laugh:

 

[Sweetest OU Girl]

I dunno about that. I bet there are people on the Baylor board blaming their loss to ND on Mulkey. :ez-laugh:

Does that include saying she is overpaid???

 

[MsProudSooner]

Does that include saying she is overpaid???

Probably.

 

[NMSooner'80]

If you don't like it, I doubt that there is anything to keep you from leaving. Does Baylor not have a message board that you can hang out on?

Probably not any Mulkey-bashing going on there, I bet...

Well done. We need a "Like" button for these. And we need a "Love" button for Baylor defeats. I'm so glad they lost, and I make NO apologies about it, especially on what's billed as an "OU board."

 

[soonermom1000]

Well, this year gave OU, TX, and BA a "taste" of progressing into the tournament. I'm sure all 3 teams will go further next year. A lot of great games we got to watch this year....These girls give their ALL, every game...CONGRATS to ALL the big 12 girls and their coaches!!! Go home, regroup, and we'll see you next year....

 

[brokebacksooner]

Hornfans has a whole thread dedicated to what Mulkey said to Empress Davenport at the end of their game. It appears their fans have the same opinion of Mulkey as most of us do. It's also interesting to note that they have BU trolls trying to derail their threads too; it's almost as if BU pays people to troll other boards to "refute" anything about their holy coach/university. Who does that?

Back to Mulkey - I'm sure Baylor has a policy on modesty; yet Mulkey strips on the sideline. I'm sure Baylor has a policy on cursing; yet Mulkey curses "better" than a sailor. I know Baylor has a policy against homosexuality; yet Mulkey continued to recruit a player who told her she was gay. Some might say that is admirable; Mulkey trying to overcome Baylor's discrimination; yet during the time she has had openly gay players, they haven't been able to be open about it and by all accounts they are kept on a short leash to ensure they stay in the closet during their time at Baylor.

I disliked Mulkey and her antics from day one when OU was regularly beating Baylor. Bill Fennelly has more wins against Sherri than he should; yet I have nothing but respect for him and his program. I "hate" Iowa State, only when OU is playing them, the rest of the time I cheer for them. I will cheer for Waco high school to beat Baylor because of Mulkey.

 

[SoonerNorm]

While most Christian affiliated institutions preach against homosexuality, that doesn't mean they do not welcome homosexuals to attend/enroll. The same would be true for stealing, lying, unmarried sex, etc. People who have stolen things or told lies or had unmarried sex are still welcome. The point is, if sinners were not welcome, no one would be in school. No one is perfect. Some here seem to think if you aren't perfect then that makes you a hypocrit. If that's true, everyone is a hypocrit including those making the accusations.

If you see an enrollment form from Baylor, I'm pretty sure you are not asked to list your sins because sinners make up the professors, staff, student body, coaches, etc.

 

[NMSooner'80]

Hornfans has a whole thread dedicated to what Mulkey said to Empress Davenport at the end of their game. It appears their fans have the same opinion of Mulkey as most of us do. It's also interesting to note that they have BU trolls trying to derail their threads too; it's almost as if BU pays people to troll other boards to "refute" anything about their holy coach/university. Who does that?

Back to Mulkey - I'm sure Baylor has a policy on modesty; yet Mulkey strips on the sideline. I'm sure Baylor has a policy on cursing; yet Mulkey curses "better" than a sailor. I know Baylor has a policy against homosexuality; yet Mulkey continued to recruit a player who told her she was gay. Some might say that is admirable; Mulkey trying to overcome Baylor's discrimination; yet during the time she has had openly gay players, they haven't been able to be open about it and by all accounts they are kept on a short leash to ensure they stay in the closet during their time at Baylor.

I disliked Mulkey and her antics from day one when OU was regularly beating Baylor. Bill Fennelly has more wins against Sherri than he should; yet I have nothing but respect for him and his program. I "hate" Iowa State, only when OU is playing them, the rest of the time I cheer for them. I will cheer for Waco high school to beat Baylor because of Mulkey.

I don't think anyone could have said it better!

 

[brokebacksooner]

While most Christian affiliated institutions preach against homosexuality, that doesn't mean they do not welcome homosexuals to attend/enroll. The same would be true for stealing, lying, unmarried sex, etc. People who have stolen things or told lies or had unmarried sex are still welcome. The point is, if sinners were not welcome, no one would be in school. No one is perfect. Some here seem to think if you aren't perfect then that makes you a hypocrit. If that's true, everyone is a hypocrit including those making the accusations.

If you see an enrollment form from Baylor, I'm pretty sure you are not asked to list your sins because sinners make up the professors, staff, student body, coaches, etc.

Let's forget about the FACT that you just compared being gay to thieves and liars (wrong forum) and look at the FACT that Brittney stated in the recruiting process that she was gay. Let's look at the FACT that KM told her that she didn't care and it wasn't an issue. Let's look at the FACT that after Brittney came on campus she was either actively or passively encouraged not to be openly gay. Let's look at the FACT that gay kids are kicked out of Baylor all of the time; simply for the reason of being gay.

I don't have a problem with KM recruiting gay players; I'm happy that she does. I do have a problem with either her or someone in the university making sure that it is clear that they can't be open. I do have a problem that she works for a Christian organization and yet acts and speaks the way that she does. I do have a problem that she doesn't follow the very code of conduct that each student there has to sign and abide by.

Baylor code of conduct states in part:

As used in this document, the term misconduct refers to personal behavior on or off campus that (1) interferes with Baylor's pursuit of its educational and Christian objectives,

Contemptuous or disrespectful behavior (I certainly don't need to cite examples here!)

Lewd or indecent behavior (showing your undergarments in public would apply here)

Expression that is inappropriate in the setting of Baylor University and in opposition to the Christian ideals it strives to uphold. (Cursing, calling out players, everyone of her press conferences)

Cohabitation. Baylor defines cohabitation as a male and female living together who are not married to each other. (so much for your unmarried sex example)

You can keep on worshiping at the altar of KM and keep criticising Sherri for not being like her. By doing so you've made it abundantly clear that you are a win at all cost, low morals type of guy. So don't get bent out of shape when you get called on it.

 

[tycat947]

Let's forget about the FACT that you just compared being gay to thieves and liars (wrong forum) and look at the FACT that Brittney stated in the recruiting process that she was gay. Let's look at the FACT that KM told her that she didn't care and it wasn't an issue. Let's look at the FACT that after Brittney came on campus she was either actively or passively encouraged not to be openly gay. Let's look at the FACT that gay kids are kicked out of Baylor all of the time; simply for the reason of being gay.

I don't have a problem with KM recruiting gay players; I'm happy that she does. I do have a problem with either her or someone in the university making sure that it is clear that they can't be open. I do have a problem that she works for a Christian organization and yet acts and speaks the way that she does. I do have a problem that she doesn't follow the very code of conduct that each student there has to sign and abide by.

Baylor code of conduct states in part:

As used in this document, the term misconduct refers to personal behavior on or off campus that (1) interferes with Baylor's pursuit of its educational and Christian objectives,

Contemptuous or disrespectful behavior (I certainly don't need to cite examples here!)

Lewd or indecent behavior (showing your undergarments in public would apply here)

Expression that is inappropriate in the setting of Baylor University and in opposition to the Christian ideals it strives to uphold. (Cursing, calling out players, everyone of her press conferences)

Cohabitation. Baylor defines cohabitation as a male and female living together who are not married to each other. (so much for your unmarried sex example)

You can keep on worshiping at the altar of KM and keep criticising Sherri for not being like her. By doing so you've made it abundantly clear that you are a win at all cost, low morals type of guy. So don't get bent out of shape when you get called on it.

THANK YOU! :woot