MJSooner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 1,248
- Reaction score
- 1,198
@StoopsBros I agree with you 100% on where OU ranks historically.OU is a top 25 program historically. As us diehards know.
The problem is Joe C. He needs to retire, or he needs to hire some kind of basketball AD/GM, and become hands-off when it comes to hoops.
His hires have been mostly awful (and his Moser extension even worse). Lon Kruger was fine but that was like hiring a Great Value coach at the time (aged, his time at UNLV was sort of stalling a bit, OU needed stabilizing). As we know, Buddy became an all-timer (and Lon gets the credit). Then Joe C let Lon stay too long. In reality, after the '16-17 season, Lon should have been forced to retire. His ending sort of led to Moser's rough beginning (fuggin' Cortes & Noland were recruits, lol)
Anyway
My biggest issue isn't losing Moser....I would 1000000000% go to his house and help load the moving truck. For free.
My biggest issue is what will change?
If Joe C is the AD, controlling OU MBB, NIL/rev share will be short-changed, and it's more likely that he'll hire another mediocre HC.
And I know from past discussions on this board over the last couple of years, you and I agree on the multitude of problems that exist with OU basketball outside of NIL- which is THE major roadblock- from admin support to marketing, to creativity, to attracting fans, to enticing and involving donors, to in-game experience, etc. The problems with OU basketball are much deeper than the coach, the arena, and NIL. And until some of them are addressed, beginning with the AD, things won't change a lot.
IMO, it also would help if OU would embrace the history much like LK did. Kelvin did it, too. I mean, let's be real. There is nothing around Norman, the campus, or LNC highlighting a lottery pick right now. Nothing on the outside of the arena (like a statue or even a big freaking plaque) admiring the greatest player to ever play in the state of Oklahoma. Should have named the court after him or something. And finally, 3-4 of the greatest players in the history of this program does not have the number retired or any real individual recognition- Hollis, Buddy, and maybe Trae should have their numbers in the rafters and maybe Najera.
But all of these issues get to the core root of the problem- the admin doesn't really support OU basketball.
Because of that, the history means nothing. I mean players today, even if it isn't just about the money, were under 10 years old the last time we made a FF and Buddy Hield was dominating college basketball. It's because of an AD who thinks his commitment means setting behind the south basket every game that we have no hype, no buzz, no NIL, no arena... and no top coach. And if PM had a $6M-7M NIL, which is what is needed for any coach to turn it around, maybe he could too.
For those reasons, I may not be all the way on the side of @IndySooner but I see his point. If PM leaves, which I'm ambivalent about, I'm afraid nothing changes, or only changes slightly, because the infrastructure and support is not there to attract a coach that can REALLY turn it around.