Third in Preseason Big 12 Coaches Vote

[got mulk??]

This is a WBB board. When did Kim here staff and player participate in killing, stealing and committing adultery. Never I think. So where are your implications directed? At the university, at the football team or are you ranting again about something unrelated to WBB?

99.9% of his posts are unrelated that's what Syb feeds off of beating a dead horse. The religious beliefs alone are all that's needed to close the door.

 

[Sweetest OU Girl]

99.9% of his posts are unrelated that's what Syb feeds off of beating a dead horse. The religious beliefs alone are all that's needed to close the door.

I sort of agree gm. Except it is your posts that are mostly unrelated to OU WBB. Just trolling, trolling, trolling, and making us all laugh at your attempt to defend and minimize the activity happening there.

 

[got mulk??]

I'm glad you find my comments comical to defend a team that I've followed for 20+ years, one that my sister was lucky to play for and a current coach that I respect. I am proud to be a Baylor Bear where I received a valuable education resulting in a successful job as a network engineer. Just because there are a few bad apples doesn't mean that EVERY apple on the tree is rotten. BTW, my posts are on topic when Baylor is brought up I give my perspective making it a full conversation not just one sided.

 

[SoonerSpock]

Don't evade the subject. The subject being addressed involves the violations and behavior under the scope of the NCAA and the media cited, just as murder falls under the scope of the commandments. Logical flow is the same. Do you forget them simply because they aren't addressed daily or because they haven't been stated in five thousand years?

Me divert the subject? Beginning with S.O.G.'s post #23 the focus of this thread has been on Kim, her violations and the timing of those violations relative to today's WBB game. The in your post #40 you did attempt to divert the subject to what it happening at Baylor right now. But got mulk, inoref, S.O.G and I continued to focus the discussion on Kim and her circumstances. But you in your post #57 again attempt to bring things back to the Baylor current sexual abuse issues by diverting the fact the Voepel, Jenkins an Muffet have not continued to rant about Kim to whether it is proper kill, steal and commit adultery and commandments. Wherein I immediately went back to this being a WBB board Kim's violation had nothing to do with killing, stealing and adultry.

And you want to say I am changing the subject. The ongoing subject has been Kim, her violations, the timing of those violations and her potential employment opportunities. None of which have anything to do with the what is happening at Baylor right now, killing, stealing or adultry.

As always you Syb are the one trying to change the subject. But that is your M.O. has been for years. As posted by gm "99.9% of his posts are unrelated that's what Syb feeds off of beating a dead horse" and then confirmed by S.O.G. "I sort of agree gm".

You are who you are. When you cannot successfully rebut a position you attempt to divert the discussion to another subject. And we all know it.

 

[Sweetest OU Girl]

confirmed by S.O.G. "I sort of agree gm".

Sorry SS, but you misquoted me by leaving off the rest of the point I made. And that was that it is gm who's posts are mostly unrelated to OU WBB.

And he started it by saying that 2016 has been a great year for BU. Truly an amazing statement even on the surface. Few programs have ever had to accept and admit - over the course of a year - to the horrible facts coming out of a school that would like to bill itself as a "Christian" University.

Every program has biased and unreasonable fans. But few get on opponent's web sites to bash the players, coaches, etc., and brag (foolishly) about their favorite team.

 

[SoonerSpock]

Sorry SS, but you misquoted me by leaving off the rest of the point I made. And that was that it is gm who's posts are mostly unrelated to OU WBB.

And he started it by saying that 2016 has been a great year for BU. Truly an amazing statement even on the surface. Few programs have ever had to accept and admit - over the course of a year - to the horrible facts coming out of a school that would like to bill itself as a "Christian" University.

Every program has biased and unreasonable fans. But few get on opponent's web sites to bash the players, coaches, etc., and brag (foolishly) about their favorite team.

My bad! I misinterpreted the intent of your statement. What has transpired at Baylor disgust me immensely. Probably the failure of the administration to be transparent and proactive in cleaning up their mess the abuse of the young ladies. Their attempts to sweep everything under the rug only enables such violations to continue and that is deplorable.

But none of those transgression are related in anyway whatsoever to Kim and her program. No more so than you should be implicated with your neighbor because they have murder charges filed against them. Likewise Kim has already served her sentence for her violations and her punishment it was not a life sentence. To so would analogous to today declaring OU a permanent cheater school for life because of the long passed violations of Wilkinson, Switzer and Bomar.

What has transpired at Baylor with regard to the sexual assault cases and the open attempt to cover things up disgust me immensely. I think the failure of the Baylor administration to be transparent and proactive in fixing the problem approaches being as bad and maybe more damaging than the assualts. It is obvious their first priority was mitigate the ordeal not fix the problem. They even went so far as to request Pepper Hamilton provide only a written report so there would be no ocular evidence of the information provided to come out at a later date.

 

[got mulk??]

Sorry SS, but you misquoted me by leaving off the rest of the point I made. And that was that it is gm who's posts are mostly unrelated to OU WBB.

And he started it by saying that 2016 has been a great year for BU. Truly an amazing statement even on the surface. Few programs have ever had to accept and admit - over the course of a year - to the horrible facts coming out of a school that would like to bill itself as a "Christian" University.

Every program has biased and unreasonable fans. But few get on opponent's web sites to bash the players, coaches, etc., and brag (foolishly) about their favorite team.

Where did I ever say 2016 is a great year for Baylor?? That post was to make an attempt to get Syb to stop bringing up the past. Maybe someone should get their facts straight. Also, I don't believe that I've ever criticized Sherri or any OU player unlike the complete hatred exhibited on the board for Baylor and Kim. I teach my kids to stand up for what they believe in but in your case SOG, you should just sit down.

 

[tycat947]

Sorry SS, but you misquoted me by leaving off the rest of the point I made. And that was that it is gm who's posts are mostly unrelated to OU WBB.

And he started it by saying that 2016 has been a great year for BU. Truly an amazing statement even on the surface. Few programs have ever had to accept and admit - over the course of a year - to the horrible facts coming out of a school that would like to bill itself as a "Christian" University.

Every program has biased and unreasonable fans. But few get on opponent's web sites to bash the players, coaches, etc., and brag (foolishly) about their favorite team.

:woot

 

[sybarite]

Those who ignore the past are doomed to repeat it. I bring up the past for a very simple reason. Had it not been for that "past," Baylor would not have assembled a team upon which its reputation is built. Jenkins and Voepel made that clear. Nearly the entire team came from that "past."

Then, you wish to compare someone who has had an honorable past and wish that she were more like Mulkey:

over-and-over
thread-after-thread

Yes, Spock. Exactly what is the statute of limitations on dishonor? Are we to forget what built this trainwreck in Waco? Kim is simply a part of a community that has indicated that anything is acceptable as long as it produces a winner. There is a reason that I brought up the commandments.

If you don't like my castigation of Kim Mulkey, stop bringing up recruiting comparisons:

over-and-over
thread-after-thread.

If you want to support Mulkey, there is a board for Baylor fans---I would assume. I don't go to their board to find out. I don't know why mulk or true colors want to come here. Celebrate your "pride" on your own board.

The thought that you would compare Sherri Coale and Kim Mulkey in any aspect of life is so reprehensible, so repulsive, that it should get anyone banned. The fact that you think it is even up for discussion calls your judgement into question, among other things. I am reminded of Joseph N. Welch.

 

[got mulk??]

I would say the 2005 NC put Baylor on the map and opened several top prospects eyes for recruiting. The level of coaching that Kim illustrated that year was remarkable considering she didn't have a single elite level player and was able to bring the team together in order to "Finish the Job!"

Not many, if any, schools will sign a top 5 recruit without winning it all.

 

[Sweetest OU Girl]

Not many, if any, schools will sign a top 5 recruit without winning it all.

Only 4 or 5 schools a year, and about 40-50 per decade. :facepalm

Sometimes I wonder ......

 

[sybarite]

I gave credit for 2005 to Mulkey. It was a good team. She did have the advantage that OU never had, a year in which UConn was not undefeated in which to challenge. It was a year with no clear favorite, and the team came together at the right time.

Then, she lost a key player to philosophical differences, and she couldn't beat Courtney once with Sophia back. It was never the same. I wonder if Mulkey would have done what she did if she had been able to beat a freshman with a team of veterans?

No matter. What she did was reprehensible, and there is no statute of limitations on integrity.

 

[AdaSooner]

Nope, think I'll hang around here for awhile longer just to be a thorn in your side!

Correction! You're not going to be a thorn in anyone's side as long as I'm around! Scrybe is right, this is an OU BB board. Behave yourself or you won't be here much longer.

Oh, one more thing. I'm not in the habit of asking twice!

 

[SoonerSpock]

I gave credit for 2005 to Mulkey. It was a good team. She did have the advantage that OU never had, a year in which UConn was not undefeated in which to challenge. It was a year with no clear favorite, and the team came together at the right time.

Then, she lost a key player to philosophical differences, and she couldn't beat Courtney once with Sophia back. It was never the same. I wonder if Mulkey would have done what she did if she had been able to beat a freshman with a team of veterans?

No matter. What she did was reprehensible, and there is no statute of limitations on integrity.

But there is a statute of limitations on Kim's violation. Look at the NCAA ruling. Her violations are in the past. Fortunately Sherri and her team realizes that and are spending their efforts to move forward. Now if Syb would allow this board to move forward instead of attempting to rehash the past we could talk about today's OU WBB and its future.

 

[got mulk??]

Only 4 or 5 schools a year, and about 40-50 per decade. :facepalm

Sometimes I wonder ......

Name the school that signed a top 5 recruit without having a single NC..........

 

[Sweetest OU Girl]

Name the school that signed a top 5 recruit without having a single NC..........

gm, I'm surprised the math of this is above your skill set.

Think about just the last 16 years (four 4-year classes of recruits). Did you know a sum total of just 6 different schools have won national championships? In that same time period, the 16 top 5 ranked recruits produced a sum total of 80 different players. Were you honestly confused enough to believe that every single top 5 recruit signed with just those 6 schools?

Here is a simple task for you. Write down the yearly top 5 recruits by year. Check and see which ones signed with a team that didn’t win a NC while they were in school. By the way, as soon as you find a year where all 5 top recruits for that year signed with 5 different schools you have a big problem - even with no further analysis.

You might start with the last 4 years. UCONN won all 4 championships. Did any one of the top 5 (20 total) sign with anyone other than UCONN?
Have fun.

 

[sybarite]

Name the school that signed a top 5 recruit without having a single NC..........

Oh. This is so difficult. Let's see. Oh, #1 Courtney Paris, #3 Ashley Paris in the same year, the freshmen that dismantled the defending #1 team three times in one year, as freshmen?

That was so hard.

 

[got mulk??]

Trap set.........2 takers with 1 going all the way! My work here is done...next thread.

 

[BanjoCharley]

How about next board?

 

[tycat947]

How about next board?

You got that right! :woot