NickZepp
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2008
- Messages
- 13,945
- Reaction score
- 1,287
Bob P on scoop confirmed the Justin Scott + Xzayvier Brown rumors fwiw. Said it’s picking up steam.
Bob P on scoop confirmed the Justin Scott + Xzayvier Brown rumors fwiw. Said it’s picking up steam.
No one doubted you could do it!
Curious to hear you guys thoughts… but I prefer Brown over Claude.
Both, please.Curious to hear you guys thoughts… but I prefer Brown over Claude.
Take him and Brown if you can make it work.
PackAbsolutely. If the money is there, you gotta do it. Adds depth 1-3 as Claude is more of the wing/SG in PM's offense, and Brown can be more of a off ball, combo type player. Plus I love Claude's size, along with JJ, that gives us length we didn't have this year.
Would love the options it puts on the floor adding Brown, Pack, and Claude to Sparky and JJ. Gives us shooters, guys that can take it off the bounce, get to the line, hit FTs, size to rebound, and depth at guard which we haven't had with PM.
Find a way to make it happen, close with a backup C or 4/5.
Pack
Brown
Claude
Davis
Wague
Bench:
Forsythe
Jones
Nwankwo
Bol, McGriff, etc.
Could definitely be a team that finishes top 5 in SEC imo
Are you really unable to count or understand basic math? You say mid teens, then say 14, and then act like I’m the one saying something ridiculous? Would any parent of a 14-year-old say their kid is in the mid teens?
Agreed... definitely take both if you can. I personally have a hard time believing we can land both and selling both a role they would desire, as well as give Pack and Davis what they have been promised as well. Unless, if these guys are unselfish and their only goal is to win a championship.I so doubted you. Jk, mostly just Lusk over-hyping a player and we all were correct there.
If you add Brennan, it's top 3.
Brown over Claude if there is a choice.
P. S. We are clearly working with way more NIL this year.
You aren't seriously debating whether 14 is "mid-teens" and implying it has to be 15 exactly, are you? Or am I misreading?
Yes, you are misreading.You aren't seriously debating whether 14 is "mid-teens" and implying it has to be 15 exactly, are you? Or am I misreading?
Well you definitely were right about Godwin I doubted Sam but you were dead on about how great a player he is.He’s never lost an argument (in his own mind).
If we add the two guys mentioned this afternoon, we could easily be near the top of the league. You know, somewhere in the mid teens.Bc of the semantics and to move on.
13 is the first "teen" number, 19 is the last.
13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
16 is dead smack in the middle. Being mid-teen.
Alright, enough of the random offset name-calling and eye-roll posts.
I'll add more comparisons tomorrow of last year to this year on projected roster value adds.