Football question

[hoopsaustin]

Jackson Arnold QBR: 47.9
John Mateer QBR: 68.2

His advanced metrics are about as close to Baker Mayfield as they are Jackson Arnold. Not comparable.

I can't find baker's college QBR but his career would be 119 according to Grok making me a conversion. So mateer would be much much closer to JA

Rating at sports reference:
Ja 125.9
Mateer 145.5

BM 175.4

So closer to JA also

 

[Eielson]

I can't find baker's college QBR but his career would be 119 according to Grok making me a conversion. So mateer would be much much closer to JA

Rating at sports reference:
Ja 125.9
Mateer 145.5

BM 175.4

So closer to JA also

QBR doesn't go above 100. You're looking at passer rating, which is a much less comprehensive stat that most have moved away from.

Baker was 80.4, 91.8, and 92.3.

 

[SoonerBounce13]

QBR doesn't go above 100. You're looking at passer rating, which is a much less comprehensive stat that most have moved away from.

Baker was 80.4, 91.8, and 92.3.

I still prefer passer rating to QBR. QBR seems to put a lot of emphasis on the qb run. Most of the time when comparing QBs, it is to look at how they are as a passer and it seems like passer rating does a better job of that than QBR

 

[Boom Soon]

Jackson Arnold QBR: 47.9
John Mateer QBR: 68.2

His advanced metrics are about as close to Baker Mayfield as they are Jackson Arnold. Not comparable.

Yeah I’m gonna go with the eye test on this one.

 

[CoachTalk]

It would be, but not for the reason that you think..

If mateer is a 6.5ish/10 QB, hawkins is like a 5.5/10.

Excluding jackson Arnold, mateer is our worst QB since Trevor knight.

What gives you confidence that hawk is close to mateer?

 

[Eielson]

Yeah I’m gonna go with the eye test on this one.

When every objective data point wildly contradicts your eye test, it's probably time to question what your eye test is worth.