Game 10 - OKC AT PAYCOM #13 OKLAHOMA (9-0) vs. OKLAHOMA STATE (6-2) 7pm CST on ESPNU

That’s quite a lot for one neutral site game in December. Might be an overstatement. If we win, it will mean little if we finish in the bottom of the conference. If we lose, it will mean nothing if we finish .500 or above in conference play.
I agree that if we still finish above .500 in conference this game will not be a big factor and have stated that we need to be > .500 several times. Winning/losing this game isn’t going to be the main thing I am looking at - it is competing. But you also never know which wins will get you over the hump so a win is always important. Would a win over UNC have made a difference last year as it turned out? And did the UNC loss (and never really being in the game) tell us more about our team than we thought/hoped before that game? Maybe on the first and probably on the second.
 
Last edited:
It’s not silly. It’s actually petty easy. You can eliminate 9 of the 13 teams immediately. The three teams in Atlantis plus Michigan are the only teams that even have a chance. Providence has finished their noncon, is barely over .500, and is nowhere near the field as of now. The Big East is down this year, so their chances for high quality wins are limited. Louisville is 6-5 and also plays in a league that won’t get many bids, so they have minimal chances to improve their resume. Plus, they have multiple guys out for the year. They will be accomplishing quite a bit if they even manage to finish the year .500. Arizona is under .500 and will enter conference play with zero meaningful wins and a handful of blowout losses. They’ll have tons of Q-1 games in the Big 12, but they’ll have to win a bunch of them to have a chance.

it’s ridiculous for some on this board to act as if trying to assess the strength of a schedule and the quality of a team’s wins is like trying to solve the world’s toughest riddle. There are so many publicly available websites that tell you all you need to know.

So, yes, barring a massive rebound by Arizona, Wednesday is our only chance to beat a tournament team outside conference play. A win Wednesday is one fewer game we have to win in January and February. A loss puts us in the same spot we were in last year. You can say it won’t be that predictive because Michigan is a unique team with two really good bigs, but the computers won’t count that game any more or less based on Michigan’s size.

We are going to be playing 18 games in a conference that is a beast. If we lose Wednesday but end up winning 9 or 10 regular season conference games, we will be in, likely with ease. I’d prefer not to have to count on doing something that we haven’t come close to doing under Moser. When you put together a really bad nonconference schedule, it makes it that much more important that you don’t miss the one chance you have to land a big scalp.
Let us know who are the conf champs and will get automatics… let’s all get rich!
Oh wait. You don’t know v
 
I agree with this. It’s wild. I can’t remember the last time Arizona was bad at basketball. Hopefully they turn the season around, because it would be nice to have one forsure victory over a tournament team come March.

OU is still in a good spot. Ten conference wins and they’re a lock.
If OU somehow gets 10 wins in the SEC this year (which is by far the best conference according to the metrics), then we are getting a 6 seed at least.....fingers crossed.
 
Let us know who are the conf champs and will get automatics… let’s all get rich!
Oh wait. You don’t know v
I’ll be happy to bet you that no one we’ve played so far will win their conference tournament. And honestly, if a team well outside the at large conversation happens to do so, that doesn’t really matter because their NET doesn’t improve that much. We are talking about wins over at large caliber teams. That’s what helps.
 
The box score says there were about 10,300 fans inside the 18,000 seat arena. In years gone by, OSU would typically have the headcount advantage in games like this.

Question for those that attended the game. Was the attendance in OKC about a 50-50 fan split? Or did one team have a noticeable advantage in fan support?

Thanks. Boomer!
 
The box score says there were about 10,300 fans inside the 18,000 seat arena. In years gone by, OSU would typically have the headcount advantage in games like this.

Question for those that attended the game. Was the attendance in OKC about a 50-50 fan split? Or did one team have a noticeable advantage in fan support?

Thanks. Boomer!
Very much an OU advantage. I could tell as soon as I drove into bricktown which fanbase showed up.
 
That’s what I’m looking for. The outcome of the UNC game was basically never in doubt and it looked obvious that we were not used to that level of competition. This Michigan team isn’t likely to be as good as UNC was last year, but it’s still a big step up from what we have faced.
It will be nice to play this “neutral site” game on an actually neutral site. unlike last year vs UNC
 
It will be nice to play this “neutral site” game on an actually neutral site. unlike last year vs UNC
Eh. We haven’t played a true road game in either of the last two seasons. Playing UNC (who doesn’t exactly have a loud, crazy fan base) in Charlotte wasn’t the worst thing in the world.

This year, our first road game will be against Bama in the conference opener. I wish that wasn’t the case.
 
Eh. We haven’t played a true road game in either of the last two seasons. Playing UNC (who doesn’t exactly have a loud, crazy fan base) in Charlotte wasn’t the worst thing in the world.

This year, our first road game will be against Bama in the conference opener. I wish that wasn’t the case.
Gosh I love the deep insight from coach on these posts. Again, mocking takes that he disagrees with without offering any actual comments. Such a wonderful thing.
 
Eh. We haven’t played a true road game in either of the last two seasons. Playing UNC (who doesn’t exactly have a loud, crazy fan base) in Charlotte wasn’t the worst thing in the world.

This year, our first road game will be against Bama in the conference opener. I wish that wasn’t the case.

Unc in charlotte isn’t much of an advantage? Is this satire?
 
I laughed at it because you said unc at Charlotte basically wasn’t a true road game
It isn’t. It is neutral site game per the NCAA. I know you’re probably arrogant enough to think your opinion matters more than how the game is classified by the body that governs the sport, but facts are facts.
 
Back
Top