Mulkey sounds off

Decide to go over to U-conn's message board, and you think OU dislikes Kim's comments????
There was 6 pages of comments....She's got the world stirred up.....again !!!!
 
I really do not think that Sherri's comments IRT Mulkey's rant will make any difference in the score. If KM could RUTS against OU and Sherri, she would do it anyway, regardless.
Let's face it, Baylor has more talent, and it is likely to be a loss for the OU women.

I can hope, though!
 
tycat947 said:
Also, the same Kim Mulkey that chastised media at press conference for voting for DRob over one of the hypocrites.

The same Kim Mulkey who grabbed Pokie Chatman and turned around following her and yelling. Then went on tirade about it during post game conference.

Same Kim Mulkey that jumped all over Sherri after freshman Nyeshia attempted 3 point shot in last few seconds of thumping of Hypocrite U.

What were Sally Jenkins and Mechelle Voepel thinking???
Click to expand...


I have a huge problem with Skeletor's attitude towards other teams' players, especially ours. That nonsense with both DRob and Ny Stevenson, in separate incidents, was despicable. Didn't KM also put a claw on a player from Texas last year?

I also work near an OSU grad who didn't really keep up with the Cowgirls until I put that quote in her hands after the Lady Skeletors beat them pretty badly in Stillwater in 2015 and the head Skeletor said, "It should have been worse." I don't think my office-mater was the least bit surprised when I was pleased that OSU got them last season.
 
BlackwellSooner said:
I really do not think that Sherri's comments IRT Mulkey's rant will make any difference in the score. If KM could RUTS against OU and Sherri, she would do it anyway, regardless.
Let's face it, Baylor has more talent, and it is likely to be a loss for the OU women.

I can hope, though!
Click to expand...

Pretty sure Texas has more talent too and certain Texas has more talent than Iowa State - there's a reason the game is played
 
I went over to The Boneyard to see what the comments had been. They do have, as stated above, six pages of comments about Kim Mulkey on The Boneyard at this time. Nearly all are rather negative, but they really aren't as informed about her past. They were a bit surprised at the comments. A few posts do mention prior comments or actions by Mulkey. The only thing that I found really interesting is that one of them had been to the Baylor boards and said that there were twenty-seven posts, all of which favored and supported Mulkey. But, on the last page or two of The Boneyard's comments was one post by a Baylor fan which supports Kim entirely and lays the entire blame for the statements at the feet of a reporter who is out to get Kim Mulkey.
 
Mulkey's recent statements were way out of line! While I am not as critical of Kim as many here are I do see as major problem in Waco is the university administration's failure to take ownership of all the problems that exist at their school and their obvious decision to mitigate its significance at any cost including demanding only a verbal report from Pepper Hamilton on sexual abuse to avoid an audit trail.

They should be proactive in making certain all things are at or above the level of performance expected of a Christian university going forward. Instead they obviously would rather attempt to hide it and pretend it never occurred. Mulkey deserves more than a hand slap this time.
 
Mulkey's recent statements were way out of line! While I am not as critical of Kim as many here are I do see as major problem in Waco is the university administration's failure to take ownership of all the problems that exist at their school and their obvious decision to mitigate its significance at any cost including demanding only a verbal report from Pepper Hamilton on sexual abuse to avoid an audit trail. Tough for the NCAA and/or Big 12 to get their hands on a report that does not exist.

They should be proactive in making certain all things are at or above the level of performance expected of a Christian university going forward. Instead they obviously would rather attempt to hide it and pretend it never occurred. Mulkey deserves more than a hand slap this time.
 
A post onThe Boneyard suggested that the firm of Pepper Hamilton is the same that handled the Sandusky matter for Penn State which they referred to as sweeping it under the rug and avoiding penalties. The implication (or direct suggestion) was that they were hired to do the same thing for Baylor, that there is no intention of getting to the bottom of anything.
 
sybarite said:
A post onThe Boneyard suggested that the firm of Pepper Hamilton is the same that handled the Sandusky matter for Penn State which they referred to as sweeping it under the rug and avoiding penalties. The implication (or direct suggestion) was that they were hired to do the same thing for Baylor, that there is no intention of getting to the bottom of anything.
Click to expand...

I have posted erroneous info. Pepper Hamilton did provide written recommendations to to Baylor. My bad for posting otherwise above. Just goes to show you should never believe anything on the internet unless you personally research the data yourself. Attached is a link with the Pepper Hamilton's list of 102 recommendations to Baylor. These recommendations are very comprehensive and I think they do attempt to get to the bottom of the problem.

Aside from the personnel actions regarding the president, athletic director, football coach and football program staff member their BOR has most definitely taken a "sweep it under the rug" mentality.

After looking at the report it appears to me the Pepper Hamilton did its job regardless what the Boneyard post you reference suggests. On the other hand, the BOR and the university administrators have not done their job. For certain, this not so good baptist thinks the university powers that be are being equally not good baptist in running their university.


https://www.baylor.edu/rtsv/doc.php/266597.pdf
 
Last edited:
So where's gotmulk and her unbiased opinion on this?
 
SoonerSpock said:
I have posted erroneous info. Pepper Hamilton did provide written recommendations to to Baylor. My bad for posting otherwise above. Just goes to show you should never believe anything on the internet unless you personally research the data yourself. Attached is a link with the Pepper Hamilton's list of 102 recommendations to Baylor. These recommendations are very comprehensive and I think they do attempt to get to the bottom of the problem.

Aside from the personnel actions regarding the president, athletic director, football coach and football program staff member their BOR has most definitely taken a "sweep it under the rug" mentality.

After looking at the report it appears to me the Pepper Hamilton did its job regardless what the Boneyard post you reference suggests. On the other hand, the BOR and the university administrators have not done their job. For certain, this not so good baptist thinks the university powers that be are being equally not good baptist in running their university.


https://www.baylor.edu/rtsv/doc.php/266597.pdf
Click to expand...

I think you will agree that Pepper Hamilton's job would be a lot easier if a staff member like Mulkey would take their advice instead of going off on a rant with a microphone in her hand and the video cameras rolling.

Kim has allowed her success to give her a perverted sense of importance that, in her mind, makes her immune to following an established protocol designed to calm the public opinion storm. She did exactly what she should not have done, made it worse.

Truth is, that's part of her personality. She is an arrogant fool who is not nearly as smart or important as she wants everyone to believe.
 
AdaSooner said:
I think you will agree that Pepper Hamilton's job would be a lot easier if a staff member like Mulkey would take their advice instead of going off on a rant with a microphone in her hand and the video cameras rolling.

Kim has allowed her success to give her a perverted sense of importance that, in her mind, makes her immune to following an established protocol designed to calm the public opinion storm. She did exactly what she should not have done, made it worse.

Truth is, that's part of her personality. She is an arrogant fool who is not nearly as smart or important as she wants everyone to believe.
Click to expand...

I think it would be a lot easier if the Baylor BOR, president, athletic director, all athletic coaches including Kim Mulkey would take ownership to the problems that exist in Waco, be responsible and do their job of leaders, teachers and role models for young kids trying to prepare themselves for the real adult world.

Kim is in a unique position to have a more positive impact on the above listed needs than most. She has failed to take full advantage of that opportunity. Sad.
 
Last edited:
ESPN 2 (NOW) Noon - 2:00 Stephen A. Smith REALLY went off Kim....It was on this morning and there is a repeat show on NOW.... It will probably come on between the 1:00 - 2:00 hour....
 
Last edited:
SoonerSpock said:
I have posted erroneous info. Pepper Hamilton did provide written recommendations to to Baylor. My bad for posting otherwise above. Just goes to show you should never believe anything on the internet unless you personally research the data yourself. Attached is a link with the Pepper Hamilton's list of 102 recommendations to Baylor. These recommendations are very comprehensive and I think they do attempt to get to the bottom of the problem.

Aside from the personnel actions regarding the president, athletic director, football coach and football program staff member their BOR has most definitely taken a "sweep it under the rug" mentality.

After looking at the report it appears to me the Pepper Hamilton did its job regardless what the Boneyard post you reference suggests. On the other hand, the BOR and the university administrators have not done their job. For certain, this not so good baptist thinks the university powers that be are being equally not good baptist in running their university.


https://www.baylor.edu/rtsv/doc.php/266597.pdf
Click to expand...

It's interesting that time after time after time Baylor insisted there was no written report.
 
Last edited:
I find it interesting that this is being blamed on the press. I had seen nothing regarding the involvement of the women's basketball program in the press.

Something was really bugging Kim Mulkey, something that I hadn't seen any indication of. She chose a very unprovocative setting in which to make her remarks. What about Senior Night was there to set her off? Was this deliberately staged or planned? There simply couldn't have been any provocation at that time. It was friendly crowd after a win. The crowd was there to celebrate the careers of their daughters.

I'm finding it difficult to believe that Kim was acting on the spur of the moment. There simply wasn't anything there to act as the irritant to generate a response. She should have been fawning over players who had been there for four years. How, exactly, did that setting result in those remarks?

I would find it more believable that Kim, knowing her confrontational tendencies, was very deliberate in the fact that she made such a statement and very exact in her choice of words. She selected words that appealed to her and to her crowd. The crowd supported her. Now, the message boards are rife with Baylor fans who support her. There is nothing here that we haven't seen before.
 
sybarite said:
I find it interesting that this is being blamed on the press. I had seen nothing regarding the involvement of the women's basketball program in the press.

Something was really bugging Kim Mulkey, something that I hadn't seen any indication of. She chose a very unprovocative setting in which to make her remarks. What about Senior Night was there to set her off? Was this deliberately staged or planned? There simply couldn't have been any provocation at that time. It was friendly crowd after a win. The crowd was there to celebrate the careers of their daughters.

I'm finding it difficult to believe that Kim was acting on the spur of the moment. There simply wasn't anything there to act as the irritant to generate a response. She should have been fawning over players who had been there for four years. How, exactly, did that setting result in those remarks?

I would find it more believable that Kim, knowing her confrontational tendencies, was very deliberate in the fact that she made such a statement and very exact in her choice of words. She selected words that appealed to her and to her crowd. The crowd supported her. Now, the message boards are rife with Baylor fans who support her. There is nothing here that we haven't seen before.
Click to expand...

Her comments seem to be related to recruiting difficulties. Maybe some recruits that she expected to show up at Senior Night didn't make an appearance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
What would convince you we’re trending forward this offseason?
2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
4K
Soonerinkc
Soonerinkc
Sooner04
Along Came Jones
Replies
5
Views
1K
ousooners1baby
ousooners1baby
S
Mulkey makes the HOF
Replies
8
Views
3K
Soonerbay
S
M
Oklahoma Daily Article on Coach Jennie
Replies
5
Views
2K
Soonerguy06
S
C
Softball Questions
Replies
13
Views
4K
OUALUMinTX
O
Back
Top