Zimwillett
New member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2014
- Messages
- 755
- Reaction score
- 0
It looks to me that OU is very likely to get a #2, with an outside shot at a #1. Ordinarily, I would be concerned that a bad conference tournament showing could slip OU to the #3 line, but a loss to Iowa State would not be classified as "bad" and I don't really see enough teams currently in the 3/4 range having enough on their resumes to bump OU off the 2 line.
I definitely think there is still a path for OU to get a #1 seed. Right now, KU, Villanova, and Virginia appear to be pretty much locked in. According to bracketmatrix.com, OU is the last #1 seed. As I see it, the remaining competition for the final #1 is:
1. Michigan State: they are hot and extremely talented. If they show well in the B1G tournament, I couldn't argue with them as a #1. They do have a pretty weak SOS (and a #14 RPI as a result) a bad loss at home to Nebraska, and far fewer "good wins" than OU. They will get some leniency because they didn't have Valentine in one of their losses to Iowa.
2. North Carolina: I don't care what Lunardi says, UNC is not a #1 seed right now. They only have 3 wins vs. the RPI top 50 and their SOS is pretty marginal. They need to put a bunch more skins on the wall in the ACC tournament before they're even in consideration for a #1 seed. The committee has shown over and over that they care about good wins more than just about anything else. UNC just doesn't measure up in that category.
3. Oregon: This is an interesting team. They have a really strong SOS, a slew of good wins, and a lot of talent. They do have some bad losses (including to UNLV on a neutral floor). But in terms of pure resume, they have a much stronger case for a #1 seed than UNC.
4. Xavier: They've got a decent resume, but I don't think it's enough to get to a #1 even if they kill it in the Big East tournament.
I never try to overestimate what a conference tournament performance means in terms of seeding, but in this case, OU would obviously improve its chances at a #1 seed dramatically each round they are able to advance this weekend.
I definitely think there is still a path for OU to get a #1 seed. Right now, KU, Villanova, and Virginia appear to be pretty much locked in. According to bracketmatrix.com, OU is the last #1 seed. As I see it, the remaining competition for the final #1 is:
1. Michigan State: they are hot and extremely talented. If they show well in the B1G tournament, I couldn't argue with them as a #1. They do have a pretty weak SOS (and a #14 RPI as a result) a bad loss at home to Nebraska, and far fewer "good wins" than OU. They will get some leniency because they didn't have Valentine in one of their losses to Iowa.
2. North Carolina: I don't care what Lunardi says, UNC is not a #1 seed right now. They only have 3 wins vs. the RPI top 50 and their SOS is pretty marginal. They need to put a bunch more skins on the wall in the ACC tournament before they're even in consideration for a #1 seed. The committee has shown over and over that they care about good wins more than just about anything else. UNC just doesn't measure up in that category.
3. Oregon: This is an interesting team. They have a really strong SOS, a slew of good wins, and a lot of talent. They do have some bad losses (including to UNLV on a neutral floor). But in terms of pure resume, they have a much stronger case for a #1 seed than UNC.
4. Xavier: They've got a decent resume, but I don't think it's enough to get to a #1 even if they kill it in the Big East tournament.
I never try to overestimate what a conference tournament performance means in terms of seeding, but in this case, OU would obviously improve its chances at a #1 seed dramatically each round they are able to advance this weekend.