MJSooner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 1,211
- Reaction score
- 1,083
This.Eddie, I was backing you for awhile since I'm really trying to be objective here. However, you keep insisting OSU shouldn't be penalized at all, which I don't think is realistic. The coaches every school employs is representing that university and that same university is held accountable when that assistant cheats.
It happened at OU a decade back with Tiny Gallon's mom getting a nice benefit. Now, here is why OU escaped a postseason ban...and there is only one reason - Joe C hired Lon Kruger. Say what you want about Kruger, but he squeaks when he walks. If OU hired almost any other coach, they would have received a postseason ban. Joe C needed to show the NCAA that OU was serious about cleaning up their men's basketball program after multiple infractions over a five-year period. That hire was 100% why OU escaped the post-season ban, so there's no point in analyzing what OU did vs. OSU.
Exactly my point when saying OSU fans weren’t defending us when the NCAA put us on probation, where one rogue coach did something wrong. We had the same thing happen with OT under Capel, but we cleaned house, and IIRC, though not sure, may have self reported or self sanctioned as well. And I remember the presser with Lon and Joe C as being one of acceptance and moving forward, not complete grandstanding like the one today.
The logic OSU fans are using today has faults in three areas:
1. “It was one rogue coach. It wasn’t OSU”. Last I checked he was an OSU employee that represents the University as a part of his job. In that job, he did something against the rules.
2. “Not fair to punish the program or current players for one guy 3-4 years earlier”. If the NCAA doesn’t punish a program, how can punishment be applied to discourage noncompliance? If Evans was the only one punished, a University could just blame individuals and never have consequences for cheating. Additionally, every single recruit and coach knew of a pending investigation and enforcement and chose to be a part of the program, even with possible sanctions.
3. “OSU cooperated and still got punished”. This may be the most comical. Cooperation AFTER a crime does not negate consequences. The violation still occurred. Plus, the NCAA levied only half the penalty that a Level 1 violation warrants, so there was a leniency by the NCAA.
I will never stand up for the NCAA- they suck- but the reaction today that the NCAA is the one at fault is quite comical.