Although I am pleased that Niemann exhibited forgiveness, I don't think it addresses the issue at all. Actually, does your response? At the time of their recruitment, Emily and Brittany were not exactly adults. I would frame the question differently. Why would an institution that is in opposition to their lifestyles recruit them?I agree it is not a legal case. I think it is an issue of two girls not respecting the religious belief of a church and school and enrolled in the school despite the conflict of their sexual orientation and were upset with the way they were treated.
However common respect for all dictates you still get the facts not just an accusation. Read the link from skillsevr regarding Emily and you get a different perspective than the one you attack. Let us not forget those that are gay chose to go to Baylor knowing the position of the church and Baylor regarding sexual orientation.
I am neither religious or gay but am a personal advocate for freedom and rights of LGBTQ community. I also know that their rights end at the doorstep of the Baptist Church and Baylor University so long as they are not deprived employment and other legal rights. The church and school also have the right to their religious beliefs as well.
If you are gay and go to Baylor expect that most are going to believe your sexual orientation is a sin and they are going to pray for you to see the light. If you don't like their approach get the h?ll out of Dodge. If you try to change their ways expect to get push back and rightly so.
They could have gone anywhere, or most places, at least. But, while knowing that their behavior was in conflict with their ideology, Baylor recruited them. The "adult" in the relationship seemed to want to win more than to have their interests at heart.