seniorsooner
New member
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 5,168
- Reaction score
- 0
Looks like Johnny felt the need to copy/paste this post from a post he had already made on the Marquette Scout board: http://mbd.scout.com/mb.aspx?s=415&f=2850&t=7363531&p=2
The ranking only goes back to the 84-85 season. Here is the explanation...
The 1984-85 season was when the NCAA tournament expanded to 64 teams, making it the first time a national champion had to win six tournament games to cut down the nets. It was also the start of the fairest inclusion in the NCAA tournament: Before that season, even the best conferences got only one team in the field. And with the introduction of the 3-point line in 1985-86, the past 24 seasons can be considered the most modern era of college basketball.
So, to rank the most consistent, most prestigious programs since 1984-85, we let the numbers do the talking.
• National title … 25
• Title game loss … 20
• National semifinal loss … 15
• Elite Eight loss … 10
• Best W-L record in conference's regular season … 5
• 30-plus wins in a season … 5
• Sweet 16 loss … 5
• Conference tournament title … 3
• AP first-team All-American … 3
• Losing in NCAA second round … 3
• Player in Top 10 of NBA draft … 2
• NCAA first-round win as a 12-16 seed … 2
• NIT title … 2
• AP second-team All-American … 2
• 20-29 wins in a season … 1
• NCAA tournament berth … 1
• Postseason NIT berth … 1
• AP third-team All-American … 1
• NCAA first-round loss to a 12-16 seed … -2
• Losing season … -3
• Ban from NCAA tournament … -3
>> Minimum 15 seasons in Division I
** Ties are broken by overall winning percentage since the 1984-85 season
^^ Teams are listed with their current conferences
!! In conferences without postseason tournament champions, the points were awarded to the regular-season champ.
I should learn to read.:facepalm
Very skewed list and shouldn't be taken serious, IMO (I know my opinion is worthless). Basketball was played before 1985...now if you want to erase Naismith-1951, go ahead.
The MU dude does know OU is spending $75M on a new Athletic Dorm complex in 2012 doesn't he?
OU is doing just fine competing against the other AD in the land.
He also forgot to add that OU Football is ranked #1 Program of modern times by most analysts.
Since then, Marquette has moved into an NBA arena. It is rarely full, and the listed attendance is of tickets sold, not actual bodies present, so at some early season games, it is less than reported. Nonetheless, I believe there have been only a handful of games in the last 20 years or so where Marquette has drawn fewer than 9000, and most were either NIT games where tickets were on sale for a couple days before the game or the result of a blizzard or the like. Marquette packs in fans, and the support for the team dwarfs that of OU. What you consider a huge crowd and would like to see on a regular basis is about half of what Marquette will average for a season. For big games against conference rivals, Marquette will double the largest crowd OU will draw in a year.
I bet he also doesn't know that I am typing this from my teepee.
Look at the Sagarin rankings by decade (that you posted) Marquette was great in the 1970's, other than that, very mediocre.
Did he really say they get twice as many for conference games as we do for our biggest games of the year?
I didn't realize there was a basketball stadium in the country that could pack in close to 30k...
Congrats to unclejohn for doing what was seemingly unthinkable: uniting the posters on this message board on a topic
For example
Marquette
vs Syracuse - 19,032
OU
vs Kansas - 8773 real attendance (10994 listed)
2010
http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/m_basketball_RB/Reports/attend/2010.pdf
2009
http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/m_basketball_RB/Reports/attend/2009.pdf
2008
http://fs.ncaa.org/Docs/stats/m_basketball_RB/Reports/attend/2008.pdf
Marquette has almost always had better attendance http://www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/public/ncaa/resources/stats/m+basketball/attendance/index.html