steverocks35
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2008
- Messages
- 8,316
- Reaction score
- 1,307
As far as I know, foul calls are non-reviewable unless the officials are trying to determine if a foul is flagrant or not.
Dude shoots 23% from the field and gets a thread started for him explaining how much better he's been playing lately, sheesh.
Shows how low he has set the bar for himself.
Dude shoots 23% from the field and gets a thread started for him explaining how much better he's been playing lately, sheesh.
Shows how low he has set the bar for himself.
Dude shoots 23% from the field and gets a thread started for him explaining how much better he's been playing lately, sheesh.
Shows how low he has set the bar for himself.
he is one of the biggest reasons OU won the game @ WVU
he is one of the biggest reasons OU won the game @ WVU
As far as I know, foul calls are non-reviewable unless the officials are trying to determine if a foul is flagrant or not.
Dude shoots 23% from the field and gets a thread started for him explaining how much better he's been playing lately, sheesh.
Shows how low he has set the bar for himself.
Naw, I'll take the rest of the team combining for shooting 57% over Reaves being one of the biggest reasons.
Nobody else on the team shot below 50%
Reaves also had a few passes come his way he didn't even attempt to catch that don't go down as his turnovers in the game.
He is an elite FT shooter though, so I hope he keeps flopping even though he takes the silliest off balance flailing shots just trying to get to the FT line.
LEAGUE STATS-
11th in league in scoring
17th in league in Reb
12th in League in Asst.
8th in league in Mins played
10th IN LEAGUE in Advanced Metrics...
29th in Total Defense.
But Keep doing your thing. I understand the FG% hasnt been there
As far as I know, foul calls are non-reviewable unless the officials are trying to determine if a foul is flagrant or not.
If Reaves had gone to the floor grasping his face and not played through it they would have 100% reviewed the call. They should have reviewed the contact to the face anyways.
I was just reading the rule book, and it looks like Coach Kruger could have requested a review to determine if it was a flagrant foul, at risk of losing a timeout. I don't know if it was worth it though at that point in the game, we had a big lead.
I agree, it likely would not have resulted in a flagrant foul.
I knew the negatives have been pointed out. Shooting % and To's.
We can live some some TO's bc we avg 9.4 a game. Top 10 in the nation in least amount of To's
Reaves averages 2.3 turnovers a game. Doo averages 2.1 per game, and not a peep about that on this board.
Every season, it's someone. This season, it's Reaves.