Hopefully someone can find me some of his tea leaves from the day he was hired at the other jobs...that way I can know what to expect in terms of improvement.
no...no wait...someone bring me the head of alfredo garcia ... that way I can know what to expect in terms of improvement.
wait...strike that...someone bring me the Eye of the Dragon amulet and a virgin ... that way I can know what to expect in terms of improvement.
all of these items have the same prognosticating abilities as his previous stats.
Ha Ha Shaka Smart-azz!
You've been taking a liicking and keep on tickin coolm, I'll give it up to you for that. If Osby "really" is that good and Cam can make the next step, that is two pretty high level players, throw in some solid coaching and attention on the defensive end and I think that you have a "solid" team.
I guess I'd compare LK to Kelvin as a benchmark because I think those two are comparable guys as far as coaching talent to win games IMHO. Where I get interested is running a zone and going:
PF: Fitz**** 6'8" [14 and 3]
PF: Osby**** 6'8" [14 and 6]
SF: Neal*** 6'7" [6 and 4]
SG: Cam****(*) 6'6" [14 and 4]
PG: Blair**(*) 6'2" [6 and 5 asst.]
SG: Pledger**** 6'4" [8 ppg.]
CG: Newell***(*) [8 ppg.]
PF: Washington [4 and 3]
PF: Goff [4 and 3]
Get's you to an average of about 70-74 ppg, not out of the realm of possibility and pure conjecture, but the point is that if I was a player at OU, I'd actually be pretty excited, fresh chance to prove myself under a new regime.
I'm not convinced this roster is devoid of talent, and LK has said it several times that he will coach according to the players that he has. The line-up I listed is not at all out of the realm of possibility, weak post presence in defense and rebounding made up for by exceptional length on the wings. That's my favorite part of this deal....we have no clue what LK is going to come up with, but it'll be something!