WTSooner
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2011
- Messages
- 11,801
- Reaction score
- 842
You did say last year the ACC was better because of the top teams, and said the bottom being bad didn’t matter.
Boulder is just pointing out your desire to only downplay OU doing well every chance you get.
That is not exactly what I said. It's a combination of things. Much like the CFP selection criteria, the facts that let you separate conferences one year may not be the same criteria that separates them the next.
One thing I've consistently said is that the Big 12, given it's size more than anything, doesn't have those 1-2 really bad teams that pull the conference down. But the bottom two teams in the Big 12 should.....SHOULD.....result in 4 wins for OU most years. So it doesn't matter if those teams are 300th in the country or 200th. They are games OU should win.