StatGeek
New member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
- Messages
- 1,946
- Reaction score
- 0
My implication was that Jones or Marshall would be no more successful than Capel was while he was here. That is what I meant by another Capel. Should have phrased it better. However, Jones is coaching in a MUCH weaker conference than Capel was in and went 8-8. Just not on board with a Jones hire. And by many on this boards admission, Marshall is not a good Xs & Os guy. He gets caught up in trying to rile up fans when he should be coaching. In some cases he will turn his back to the floor (which is similar to putting ones head in their hands) to pump up the crowd. If you can't see that Jones and Marshall are just as risky as any other name out there, you are ignorant. It is all conjecture at this point. No one is going to be pleased with how this turns out.
I am not a Jones guy either, with all due respect to the guy from Wichita that criticized Marshall's actual coaching ability, I trust a proven history of success (and my own eyes) more than his analysis. I don't remember claiming that any candidate was without risk, but I realize you really just wanted to call me ignorant as payback. I certainly agree that it's all conjecture at this point but I disagree that everyone will be displeased with the eventual hire.