You didn't prove anything. And the fact that you don't understand that, shows that I should probably just leave you alone, and let you run your mouth. SOS proves NOTHING in the discussion we were having. And I showed that. Laid it out, clear as can be done.
Convenient of you to utilize this revisionist history.
Now back to reality, the only thing you showed was just how ill-informed you were regarding the topic at hand. You were spouting off all this nonsense that OU's schedule is usually drastically worse than an SEC schedule, and used your presumed difference between Bama and OU as your example. So, I showed an SOS ranking from arguably the most respectable system that debunked your wack theory. I think that proves enough.
So basically, you pimped up the SOS until it didn't fit your argument, right? That's what it looked like to me. Sorry, but I'll take a system that is actually relevant, way over WTSooner's system. You've shown enough over the last few weeks that you are lost when it comes to the game of football.
Normally, I wouldn't bring a former debate back up... But just don't call someone ignorant when that's nothing more than the pot calling the kettle black, particularly over the last few weeks.
Exactly why "rankings" don't mean squat, especially 3-4 weeks into a season. OU isn't the best team in the country. Clearly. And just b/c we played craptastic ball, doesn't inflate Mizzou's worth.
OU might not be the best team in the country, but they are still an extremely legit squad this season, where their home games are arguably the toughest for an opponent to play in all of college football. The fact that Mizzou came in and actually gave OU fits hurts your flawed belief that Mizzou is some pathetic program. But again, it's not shocking to have reality contradict your opinions regarding football.
I know you from the football boards. You're a blow-hard know it all over there, and now you are acting that way here. Forgive me, but I'll call you out on it every time.
If someone that disagrees with your opinions because that someone actually does research and observes facts (it isn't hard, anyone can do it) is considered to be a "blow-hard know it all", then whatever. I guess that makes a ton of people belong in that category. But I won't lose any sleep over some sports jester that repeatedly gets clowned on by fellow posters on here. It totally makes sense why I've seen others engage in heated debates with you on this board now... You need a serious dose of reality.
But continue to "call" me out on my posting tendencies, whatever that means. I'll just sit here and laugh.
