Wait, there is and always will be only one set of facts. You are correct in that we don't know what those facts will determine as far as consequences, but there are still only one side of the truth.
What may I ask is the other side to this story than the facts based on statistics and health professionals?
You are correct about facts,but we did not know a couple of weeks ago that Italy would be so hard hit. It happened and because of so we now know the realization. Point is the facts of the outcome have still yet to be written for the most part and it is a dynamic situation that can change and will change throughout the process. At some point we will get a glimmer of hope and the next day will indicate the opposite.
You are correct about facts,but we did not know a couple of weeks ago that Italy would be so hard hit. It happened and because of so we now know the realization. Point is the facts of the outcome have still yet to be written for the most part and it is a dynamic situation that can change and will change throughout the process. At some point we will get a glimmer of hope and the next day will indicate the opposite.
here .... let me draw the diagram:
minimizing the effects = more people get together = more people exposed = more people dead. we do not have the respirators or the space so it has nothing to do with how deadly it is in other places. the problem is limited by OUR ability to treat the ill here in the US.
and saying "there are 2 sides so we wait until we know better" just equals more people dead. thats why you fail on the side of safety even if it costs you some stock market points.
I think a regional manager once said this exact quote at a meeting where I fell asleep.
And I've noticed that you keep some strange hours.
no. you're missing the point. the limiting factor isn't the disease ... it's our inability to deal with this type of disease. waiting on numbers from italy is a gross conceptual error.
I am in no way "waiting on numbers from Italy." Where do you get this stuff from and I'm being quite hospitable here. I am talking about knowing the future before it occurs, obviously.
I am in no way "waiting on numbers from Italy." Where do you get this stuff from and I'm being quite hospitable here. I am talking about knowing the future before it occurs, obviously.
Well some things we do know. Unless the world ends tomorrow, Covid-19 infections will expand logarithmically, it's a mathematical certainty.
Well some things we do know. Unless the world ends tomorrow, Covid-19 infections will expand logarithmically, it's a mathematical certainty.
and all you're doing now is walking it back. you said "well these are dynamic changing numbers and fear will happen and then be alleviated the next day". we DO know the future ... people are going to die ... so we should be working to stop that.
Then why haven’t they in the USA?
The first case here was in middle Jan before Italy
Then why haven’t they in the USA?
The first case here was in middle Jan before Italy
I'm not walking back a Goddamn thing. Get a grip. I said some days will appear better than others. I mean how hard is that to figure out. And no one is purposely trying to magnify the damage to be wrought.
There's a big difference between a person that caught the virus somewhere else and came here, and when the virus starts becoming community-acquired, the latter is when you start seeing the logarithmic growth.
This. Is. Not. The. Flu.
Read the thread, we've covered this extensively.
Covid-19 is in the same family of viruses as SARS and MERS.
Deny it all you want but you were offering up reasons to not take the issue seriously. you were minimizing it. it's an emergent threat and not something "to take more casually and kick down the road".