Post Texas game locker room

[BoulderSooner]

Those people are ridiculous. He started for Big XII Tournament team as a true freshman. He is way beyond a question of whether or not he belongs in D-I. Anyone that starts at a Big XII school as a true freshman is clearly a D-I level player.

even more so the starting point on a big 12 team that finished second in conf and was also a NCAA tourney team

 

[BigTime]

At least a few on this very board questioned whether Woodward was good enough for Division 1.

I'm with you, Section. Criticism can be constructive. But when it's taken to the extreme, the criticizer forfeits credibility.

I don't recall anyone saying that. Care to post the thread?

 

[scrybe]

I don't recall anyone saying that. Care to post the thread?

No, but if you care to review every thread from the period of late November through December, you'll find that opinion posted more than once.

 

[SoonerBounce13]

No, but if you care to review every thread from the period of late November through December, you'll find that opinion posted more than once.

I highly doubt anyone said he wasn't a d1 player.

 

[Max Power]

I don't recall anyone saying that. Care to post the thread?

I remember seeing it after either Washington or Creighton. But you know as well as I do that some people just go full retard after losses

 

[Sooner04]

January 10, 2015, 8:41 PM: Post #4

Figured Walker would start, since the backup PG is already starting - Cousins.

I hope Woodard proves me wrong, but right now, he's not a D1 player.

Same thread: Post #20

Woodard probably the worst point guard in the Big 12.

January 13, 2015, 8:28 PM: Post #3

This won't be the brightest idea, but Cousins should take over the PG position going forward. Woodard is incapable of not only taking care of the ball, he can't hit the broad side of a barn offensively. Hell, he makes Gottdweib look like Skeeter Henry which is saying something. What a sophomore meltdown of epic proportions were all witnessing. :facepalm

 

[BigTime]

Thanks 04. I tend to just not read those types of threads.

 

[scrybe]

Thanks 04. I tend to just not read those types of threads.

But you obviously like to call out someone who does read those types of threads and mentions them in another thread?