wow ... so much for my Iowa State theory!!

[coolm]

aint the NCAA's amazing?

and I thought ISU was dominant!!

 

[steverocks35]

Niang had a terrible game and UAB played lights out.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[sperry]

aint the NCAA's amazing?

and I thought ISU was dominant!!

You thought a team that had been down double digits in like 6 straight games was dominant?

 

[coolm]

UAB killed them on the boards and ISU did their normal doldrum play expecting for lightning to strike ... and it did - for UAB.

 

[sheepdogs1]

Niang had a terrible game and UAB played lights out.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He was throwing up lazy shots all day.

 

[coolm]

You thought a team that had been down double digits in like 6 straight games was dominant?

yes. I did. and I did just so you could be mean to me again. doesn't that make you feel good!!

 

[bocabull]

The Big XII is just not that talented. OU was dramatically over seeded because of the overrated conference. We better take advantage of the undeserved gift.

 

[coolm]

The Big XII is just not that talented. OU was dramatically over seeded because of the overrated conference. We better take advantage of the undeserved gift.

you could be right there.

 

[MNsooner]

Way too early to generalize about the big 12. I think we all knew ISU could lose if they didn't shoot well. If a bunch of teams go down, then I might agree with boca.

 

[SoonerDan]

The Big XII is just not that talented. OU was dramatically over seeded because of the overrated conference. We better take advantage of the undeserved gift.

Because I St lost, OU is overseeded. Interesting logic there.

 

[NickZepp]

I wouldn't call ISU dominant. Very good team, but not dominant. UAB did a great job defensively and were the better team after the first 5 minutes.

Sent from my KFTHWI using Tapatalk

 

[coolm]

I thought they were going to PLAY dominant. Not that they've been dominant.

They didn't. I was wrong. I'm sure it will happen many more times before I shuffle off this mortal coil.

 

[bocabull]

Because I St lost, OU is overseeded. Interesting logic there.

Do you honestly believe OU is one of the 12 best teams in the nation?

VCU has a better overall record, better RPI, better record vs top 100 teams and won their conference tourney. They are a 7 seed playing Ohio State. We are a 3 seed playing Albany. lol Total gift.

 

[152219]

Do you honestly believe OU is one of the 12 best teams in the nation?

VCU has a better overall record, better RPI, better record vs top 100 teams and won their conference tourney. They are a 7 seed playing Ohio State. We are a 3 seed playing Albany. lol Total gift.

Quit throwing out the top 100 wins metric. The committee doesn't care about it and never has. It is top 25 and top 50 wins.

 

[coolm]

He's not using it as some line to say they belong or not ... he's using it to compare talent. there's a difference.

 

[MNsooner]

Quit throwing out the top 100 wins metric. The committee doesn't care about it and never has. It is top 25 and top 50 wins.

I glanced and it looks like we have more wins against top 50 than them. Obviously we played in a harder conference. In fact, they haven't even played in a top 25 RPI team since early December. In the end, they have similar case to OU except that they haven't beat a top-25 caliber team since December. We've played three quarters of the season since then.

 

[stormspencer]

It's way to early to knee jerk and overreact. Its the first afternoon of the first day. Upsets happen. Did the ACC suck last year when Duke was a three seed and lost to Mercer? The big 12 may end up being overrated, but it's awfully early to draw any conclusions.

 

[BoulderSooner]

13-0 run to end the game for Georgia st Baylor done

 

[coolm]

13-0 run to end the game for Georgia st Baylor done

yep. you can't go into a shell like that. like the announcer said you lose ALL momentum and give the other team the chance they need to crawl back in it.

Nice job by Ga State to keep their heads in it though. Great drama!!!!

 

[bocabull]

Quit throwing out the top 100 wins metric. The committee doesn't care about it and never has. It is top 25 and top 50 wins.

The committee did a terrible job. There is no difference between #45 and #85.