WVU Game

I guess I did not say that well. What I meant was, when you are playing with a team that was playing the way OU was, I feel there was a good chance that Ana played the way she did because, she has been here before, i.e. last year.
When your teammates are playing better, then you not only do not overplay, and you also have a tendency to play better.

I realize that we may all have different opinions on why Ana was not playing within herself. I imagine there is more than one reason.

Anyway, don't mean this as an argument. Just attempting to be more clear about my post.

No reason to presume you were arguing. A different perspective is something we all have at times. In reality regarding whichever OU team all we have is an opinion that is of little value in the grand scheme of things. They are really good only for website chatter.
 
Well, Coach Coale gave credit to Colton for some second half changes in the OSU game. It had something to do with his noticing either something they were doing on defense or that we were doing on defense.

EDIT: And for whatever it means or doesn't, it seems during the game that he talks to Sherri and vice-versa. Seems like he talks to the players also.

NOT SAYING that the addition of Coquese and Jackie have not made a difference. Just pointing out some other obvious differences, which, again, I do not know the difference they do or do not make.
Also, Amanda may have bonded with some of the players and may be helping. IT would be nice to have access to practices and other info to know who is doing what and the difference each is or is not making.

We all give Coale grief for hiring her son with no experience. However, I noticed WVU's coach has his son on staff, and I looked at his resume. His resume isn't much Bette than Coltons. Just thought it was interesting.
 
OU's far from alone in the nepotism business. It seems to be all over hoops more so than any other sport.
 
No reason to presume you were arguing. A different perspective is something we all have at times. In reality regarding whichever OU team all we have is an opinion that is of little value in the grand scheme of things. They are really good only for website chatter.

Exactly. Another statement that I wish I had added to my post. :)
 
Back
Top