BCSooners
OklahomaHoops 2024 Bracket Champion
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2012
- Messages
- 5,108
- Reaction score
- 329
I will concede that for the most part, OU is a bad example in terms of scheduling. They played a good schedule.
Hogwash.... OSU started 0-9 or something in the league. Kansas State sucks.. Iowa State sucks. They get a pretty good dose of unsavory teams.
I don't know how prevalent this is in basketball, but a lot of times the bigger schools hold so much sway when scheduling. Will high majors regularly agree to go on the road and play good mid-majors? Does LA Tech schedule weaker teams to pad wins, or because its difficult to get other schools to agree to play them regularly?
I wonder if home-and-away contracts could be designed for this? Unfortunately, that would result in playing the same team twice. For example, OU agrees to games (in a single season) with Northern Iowa. They play them at home, and then some other time in the season play them in Iowa.
The reason I bring that up, is I don't know its necessarily a fair metric that Texas Tech gets to play all their league games at home to prove their worth, but Northern Iowa likely only has a chance to go to Lubbock to prove their worth.
Subjective... A lot of times "the better team" is simply being gauged by who they played, not even really who they beat. That's why everyone keeps including SOS, because Tech played the #1 team 4-5 times this year. They didn't win them, but it pads the stat. If Richmond played in the Big 12 this year, would they go 0-18? Or would they be competitive and have chances at good wins like Tech, OU, etc had?
The same OSU team that beat Houston, Ole Miss by 41, & finished 7-11 in conference. ISU had their lottery pick, beat ranked Seton Hall, lost to Auburn by 4. KSU beat Tulsa who apparently wouldn’t lose as many games as Tech in the Big12. Those teams aren’t good but they aren’t cake games.
The better team has more good wins & less bad losses.