MBB TPT2 TRANSFER PORTAL THREAD 2

WichitaSooner said:
A couple somewhat interesting tidbits in Bob P's latest article. He floated the idea that they may save one of the two remaining scholarships, which would make zero sense. He also mentioned that Moser may be coaching for his job this season.

No real update on Johnson, other than saying again that he thinks it is down to OU and USC. He did emphasize that they need to land a four because they don't currently have one on the roster.
Click to expand...

I think Bob feels that Porter held back in recruiting last year, as he didn't want to offer spots that weren't guaranteed to be there. I get it, but if that's the case, he probably just has to get over it in this era. I think that Moser took this into consideration when he brought in Soares, Darthard, and possibly Johnson. That's three guaranteed open spots for next year. I don't see us needing more than that.
 
Soonerinkc said:
I think most on here...being on either side of the Moser argument would agree with that.

we can't keep replacing 5-6 guys every year....or miss the tournament.
Click to expand...

We will always be replacing 5-6 players every year. Just about every single team will be.
 
WTSooner said:
I think it makes sense. When you have this much turnover, there is no way you can recruit a roster where people are going to be happy being at the end of the bench. Outside of a starting 4, we probably have the guys that are going to play on our roster. You could recruit a HS kid to come and sit and develop maybe, but what Portal kid is going to want to do that?

And yeah, he BETTER be coaching for him job. I'm tired of him ruining what used to be something that I enjoyed.
Click to expand...

I think your argument cuts the opposite way.. since every one leaves anyway, use the scholly on someone. They may go off and put a lesser player on the bench (then that player leaves) or they dont in which case that player leaves anyway and youre back to having the same scholly open anyway

Having SRs on the team at all times is super important tho! It guarantees the amount of high school kids you can 1000% offer schollys to
 
They are hammering for a 4 man! Ou football is helping
 
Confused at why this is so hard. We have a wide open starting spot at the 4 in the best basketball conference in the country…surely someone wants that spot.
 
pnkranger said:
Confused at why this is so hard. We have a wide open starting spot at the 4 in the best basketball conference in the country…surely someone wants that spot.
Click to expand...

I’d guess it’s because other schools in great leagues also have a starting spot available, and many of them have won a lot more games than we have the past couple years.
 
rickjames said:
There have been so many in-conference transfers recently. It’s ridiculous.
Click to expand...

Want to stop all the nonsense with NIL? it's pretty easy and something the NCAA could probably do. And it is nothing to do with NIL or capping NIL- which wouldn't hold up legally or legislatively.

Rescind the change to the transfer rule that allows for immediate eligibility for one-time transfers, and require non-hardship transfers or grad transfers to sit out a year. Like it was before COVID. That solves the problem, and eliminates a lot of the shady but technically legal payments, stops recruiting off of other rosters, and even slows in-conference yearly flips. But we know the NCAA doesn't have the stones to do anything.

Can't enforce the in-conference transfer penalty, as conferences could overrule it. But at least something is better than what we have now.
 
MJSooner said:
Want to stop all the nonsense with NIL? it's pretty easy and something the NCAA could probably do. And it is nothing to do with NIL or capping NIL- which wouldn't hold up legally or legislatively.

Rescind the change to the transfer rule that allows for immediate eligibility for one-time transfers, and require non-hardship transfers or grad transfers to sit out a year. Like it was before COVID. That solves the problem, and eliminates a lot of the shady but technically legal payments, stops recruiting off of other rosters, and even slows in-conference yearly flips. But we know the NCAA doesn't have the stones to do anything.

Can't enforce the in-conference transfer penalty, as conferences could overrule it. But at least something is better than what we have now.
Click to expand...

Your plan makes so much common sense, the NCAA won’t be able to understand it!
 
MJSooner said:
Want to stop all the nonsense with NIL? it's pretty easy and something the NCAA could probably do. And it is nothing to do with NIL or capping NIL- which wouldn't hold up legally or legislatively.

Rescind the change to the transfer rule that allows for immediate eligibility for one-time transfers, and require non-hardship transfers or grad transfers to sit out a year. Like it was before COVID. That solves the problem, and eliminates a lot of the shady but technically legal payments, stops recruiting off of other rosters, and even slows in-conference yearly flips. But we know the NCAA doesn't have the stones to do anything.

Can't enforce the in-conference transfer penalty, as conferences could overrule it. But at least something is better than what we have now.
Click to expand...

I agree that is probably one of the only fixes the NCAA can do to stop mass, FA-like switching of teams every year, largely based on dollars. That wasn't what NIL was meant to be. It was supposed to be giving the players back some of the money they were earning the schools. Instead, the schools don't give them anything all of these outside sources are simply buying them with no return. That isn't NIL. I still think if the NCAA really wanted to play ball, they would have a legal position to step in and say some of these deals aren't NIL.

No different then when Bomar got busted for getting paid without working. Have a job? Fine. But you actually have/had to show up for your job. Want to receive NIL? Fine, but you should probably have to actually do something to earn it, or show where your name/image/likeless has generated income for the person paying you. That isn't difficult to do. Tedious? Probably, but not difficult.
 
MJSooner said:
Want to stop all the nonsense with NIL? it's pretty easy and something the NCAA could probably do. And it is nothing to do with NIL or capping NIL- which wouldn't hold up legally or legislatively.

Rescind the change to the transfer rule that allows for immediate eligibility for one-time transfers, and require non-hardship transfers or grad transfers to sit out a year. Like it was before COVID. That solves the problem, and eliminates a lot of the shady but technically legal payments, stops recruiting off of other rosters, and even slows in-conference yearly flips. But we know the NCAA doesn't have the stones to do anything.

Can't enforce the in-conference transfer penalty, as conferences could overrule it. But at least something is better than what we have now.
Click to expand...

I don't think they even need to go that far. I have no issues with the one-time transfer rule. If they simply start strictly enforcing the rule that you have to sit a year on your second or subsequent transfer, that would eliminate a lot of the issues we are seeing now. Guys would be less likely to transfer on a whim if they knew they could only do it once without having to sit. I am fine with letting them transfer once without sitting.
 
MJSooner said:
Want to stop all the nonsense with NIL? it's pretty easy and something the NCAA could probably do. And it is nothing to do with NIL or capping NIL- which wouldn't hold up legally or legislatively.

Rescind the change to the transfer rule that allows for immediate eligibility for one-time transfers, and require non-hardship transfers or grad transfers to sit out a year. Like it was before COVID. That solves the problem, and eliminates a lot of the shady but technically legal payments, stops recruiting off of other rosters, and even slows in-conference yearly flips. But we know the NCAA doesn't have the stones to do anything.

Can't enforce the in-conference transfer penalty, as conferences could overrule it. But at least something is better than what we have now.
Click to expand...

the sec for football went to a in conf transfer rule that if you don't transfer in the first window (the 45 days after bowl picks) you can't transfer in conf and play the next season ..
 
What's the connection with the Colorado WR transfer from Allen, TX that's visiting OU?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

StoopsBros
Transfer Portal Thread
127 128 129
Replies
3K
Views
419K
AdaSooner
AdaSooner
S
Wichita State (8-2) Roster
Replies
7
Views
3K
usedtobe1
U
OUHoops
>>>>>>>OU-Wisconsin Gameday Thread<<<<<<<
2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
8K
BoulderSooner
BoulderSooner
OUHoops
*******OU-Southeastern Louisiana Game Thread*******
3 4 5
Replies
94
Views
16K
stormspencer
stormspencer
OUHoops
**********OU-Ohio Pregame Notes/Game Thread**********
2 3
Replies
41
Views
5K
tycat947
T
Back
Top