...
And I'll add this comment. While I think there is a rivalry here that is two-sided, it is typically one that isn't heated or brought up often. Most of my experiences with seeing it discussed in any kind of heated way, was when it was brought up in certain context. It isn't like Tulsans just sit around bad mouthing OKC. And I'm sure OKC folks don't sit around just bashing Tulsa either. It isn't THAT kind of rivalry. But it is one that once the topic has been broached, both sides have very strong opinions.
You are missing the point. Tulsa isn't better than OKC because we get chain restaurants first. Tulsa gets chain restaurants first because it is "better" (or at least, higher on the pecking order). Don't worry, I'm sure NYC gets them before Oklahoma has even heard of them. And I don't know how far back you are going on your NYC used to not have any chain restaurants claim, but I visited about 20 years ago, any there were EVERYWHERE. Not that it matters. NYC is unique enough as an American city that there is nothing about a comparison of NYC to any midwestern city that makes any sense at all.
Come on people. There are "chain" restaurants in every single city with the economies of scale to support the business model. The evidence would also show the consistency and quality of food at the successful chains exceeds that of many higher priced local establishments.
Have never lived in Tulsa or OKC but the topography of Tulsa is undeniably more appealing.
Nonsense.
And all you need to know about what the restaurant industry thinks of the two cities is that Tulsa gets almost every "new" chain restaurant before OKC does.
For the most part, both dislike each other. It certainly isn't "one-sided".
By the way, Tulsa is better.
Nonsense.
And all you need to know about what the restaurant industry thinks of the two cities is that Tulsa gets almost every "new" chain restaurant before OKC does.
Lol. I've never heard an okc resident complain about Tulsa. Tulsa has little brother syndrom
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You are missing the point. I agree that chains don't make the city. But there is an order that "most" chain restaurants open in. And that fact that "most" open in Tulsa before OKC is telling. Whether anybody wants to admit that or not. Just like it's telling that most of them open in Dallas before either Tulsa/OKC. Tulsa has plenty of local, or Tulsa-only restaurants that compare just fine with anything OKC has.
Truth of the matter is, both cities are pretty darn equal in terms of what they offer, save a few things. The biggest to me is landscape, scenery, and all that jazz. I'm no tree hugger, but I like that Tulsa has hills and trees. I like that the lakes that are nearer to Tulsa are some of the best in the state. I like that it's just prettier country in the Tulsa part of the state. That is the first "big" advantage I'd give Tulsa.
Second is the people. Again, there isn't an earth-shattering difference, and this gap is certainly closing, but, and I'll try to say this in as non-offensive a way as I can, but Tulsans tend to be a more cultured people than folks that live in the City. The gap isn't this wide, but to me, and others I've discussed this with, it's a lot like Dallas vs FTW. FTW is a nice city. Solid place to raise a family. But it's a little more "farm" or "cowboy" than Dallas. OKC has a little more of that element still. Like I said, that gap is certainly closing, and probably will continue to close. But there is nothing OKC can do to even out the landscape difference I laid out above. And from most TRULY nonpartisan people that I've heard discuss that matter, the first thing they usually say is that Tulsa is simply a prettier place to live. So it does matter.
Everything else, pretty darn even. For all the money that OKC is spending, Tulsa is doing the same. Our downtown has changed 100x for the better in the recent year. We're about to get a giant family park down on the river, and that will likely spur further river development. The Creeks are about to do a major project at their casino that sits on the river, turning it into a resort, destination type hotel. Our highways has nearly all been reworked in a major way in recent years. There are TONS of projects in the works for Tulsa, just like OKC has, and has had in recent years.
I wish Tulsa did as my family would go there a couple times a week but there is NOTHING in Tulsa that attracts the burbs to go downtown.
I disagree with the majority of your post and think the nonsense about Tulsa having nothing downtown is disingenuous. Have you been downtown in the last two years? At least three new museums, the Guthrie Green, The Brady District? There are tons of people out there every night and the BOK center brings in great acts, not to mention the New Drillers Ballpark.
Downtown Tulsa is a vibrant place and it's only getting better.
Those stinking snotty non Oklahomans are probably jealous of the bass pro. lol
Uhh.....Houston's downtown is garbage.
I'll give you Austin and SA. Sorry, but I won't give you OKC. I firmly believe Tulsa has caught up with them, or any difference is negligible. And I can say that, b/c I spent three days in downtown OKC this past week, on two different occasions. It's nice. But it doesn't offer anything that Tulsa now doesn't offer.