steverocks35
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2008
- Messages
- 8,347
- Reaction score
- 1,348
Speaking of per capita, we have 5% of the world’s population but we have had 25% of the world’s deaths.
Yep.... it was their public position in the beginning to do the herd thing, and it cost a lot of lives.
Spain, Italy and France also have a higher death rate compared to us. Throw in England and most of Western Europe's population centers have a significantly higher mortality rate than here. We have done better from a comparative stance.
Besides England, which of the other 3 countries utilized the "herd" mentality?
I guess you guys never heard the expression,
"The buck stops here!"...........?
Who's supposed to be running the show??? We had people in the different departments of the government that were telling trump what was going to happen.......he ignored them all, until the horses were out of the barn.
That's why we lead the world in covid19 deaths. The United States of America leads the world in deaths from an infectious disease! Let that soak in.....
We had the same opportunities to take precautions as every other nation...but why did we have the results we have now. Why did other nations have substantially better outcomes? Why are other nations thinking of banning our tourists?
I'm sure you have rational reasons we're leading the world in deaths from covid 19........
Maybe because trump promised that there would be free testing when this all began....and it ain't over. Because testing is the only rational way to fight the disease.....if you don't test, you can't find the people that are spreading the disease and track them down for quarantine.
Do you think Oklahoma should have had people trying to figure out our response to the disease??? What good does it do for one state to plan a response when every other state does nothing??? The response had and has to be coordinated or you get stupid results.
trump has given up on this because he failed....he wants to move on to something else that isn't such a super clusterfu&k.
By the way, China and India have bigger populations than we do.....
This is an example of what happens when you put people that don't believe in government in charge of the government.
Going to work now.....
Maybe, but IMO, it's kind of to each their own. If you are wearing a mask, you are probably safe, regardless of what Bob in the cube next two you decides to do. Him not wearing a mask is more detrimental to HIM than it is to YOU.
NO. no no no no no. You wear the mask for everyone else's protection, not your own. How many millions of times does that have to be said??
You can't make people do that. So wear your OWN damn mask to protect yourself if you have to be out in public. Those not wanting to are putting themselves more at risk than others. That is their right. And if they come down with the CV and it kills them or affects their lives, that is on them.
https://www.newswest9.com/amp/article/news/health/coronavirus/north-texas-family-shaken-after-18-relatives-test-positive-for-covid-19-following-surprise-birthday-party/287-ea8960ea-4c3c-40c1-b75e-f4437fe6f836?__twitter_impression=true
Reading this article should give you some idea of how contagious this is. They were in the same house for a couple of hours, doing their best to socially distance. In Oklahoma we have elderly people sitting shoulder to shoulder at casinos.
Doing their best to social distance?
1. That many people can't socially distance in a normal house.
2. The article has a frickin' picture of them handing on each other. That is not "trying" to social distance.
Again, wearing a mask is more about protecting other people than protecting yourself, and yes you can make people do that. In my facility, all people must wear masks.
You can't make people do that. So wear your OWN damn mask to protect yourself if you have to be out in public. Those not wanting to are putting themselves more at risk than others. That is their right. And if they come down with the CV and it kills them or affects their lives, that is on them.