Trinity Oliver to Baylor

[Soonerbay]

Surely our recruiting slump/pit is no surprise. I was the most despised poster on this site for years and accused of all types of personal vendettas against SCoale simply because I stated that she did not make top 20 signings a priority. I've been saying this since at least 2009...that the team was going to go from very good/FF type teams to good, to mediocre at best due to the lack of top level recruiting that results in the lack of winning/FF experience. It's hard to get there and then it's tough to stay there when you don't have the talent. We are there. Surely there are no surprises.

 

[Mac]

Surely our recruiting slump/pit is no surprise. I was the most despised poster on this site for years and accused of all types of personal vendettas against SCoale simply because I stated that she did not make top 20 signings a priority. I've been saying this since at least 2009...that the team was going to go from very good/FF type teams to good, to mediocre at best due to the lack of top level recruiting that results in the lack of winning/FF experience. It's hard to get there and then it's tough to stay there when you don't have the talent. We are there. Surely there are no surprises.

Glad to have you back posting again...

 

[got mulk??]

Got Mulk, I'm glad to see you here. I've been meaning to ask you if new female students at Baylor get a free Female Self Defense course and a coupon for $100.00 off on lawyer fees.

Thought this was a WBB board? Guess someone likes to color outside the lines.

BTW, we are ranked pre season #1 Sic'em!!

 

[SoonerSpock]

Surely our recruiting slump/pit is no surprise. I was the most despised poster on this site for years and accused of all types of personal vendettas against SCoale simply because I stated that she did not make top 20 signings a priority. I've been saying this since at least 2009...that the team was going to go from very good/FF type teams to good, to mediocre at best due to the lack of top level recruiting that results in the lack of winning/FF experience. It's hard to get there and then it's tough to stay there when you don't have the talent. We are there. Surely there are no surprises.

Damn the truth hurts!!!

 

[got mulk??]

Sorry. But, nobody, as I stated, despises Geno, Muffet, Pat, Brenda, etc. Why is Kim different? Nobody hated Marsha Sharp when she won, or Judy Conradt. Why Kim??

Who has actually said that they hate Kim, a credible source not just some disgruntled non BU fans that carry not weight?

 

[SoonerSpock]

Surely our recruiting slump/pit is no surprise. I was the most despised poster on this site for years and accused of all types of personal vendettas against SCoale simply because I stated that she did not make top 20 signings a priority. I've been saying this since at least 2009...that the team was going to go from very good/FF type teams to good, to mediocre at best due to the lack of top level recruiting that results in the lack of winning/FF experience. It's hard to get there and then it's tough to stay there when you don't have the talent. We are there. Surely there are no surprises.

Damn the truth hurts!!! But I have touted the same concerns for years as well.

 

[sybarite]

Who has actually said that they hate Kim, a credible source not just some disgruntled non BU fans that carry not weight?

Have you seen the you tube of Walz? Do the columns of Voepel and Jenkins not suggest that they don't exactly appreciate Kim Mulkey? They suggest that coaches were less than enamored. Then, there are the known feuds, like with the LSU coach.

Kim does fit right in with what the Baylor perception has become. You don't see it on this board. But, try looking at the various football boards concerning their attitudes toward Baylor. I don't know that anyone is shedding tears that Baylor is finally under the microscope of the NCAA. The assertions against Briles by various coaches have been interesting, It sounds like what is said about Kim.

Go look at the discussion of adding BYU to the conference and see if Baylor isn't brought up.

Coaches tend not to be open with their negative remarks. See if you can find some that applaud Kim for her character development.

 

[got mulk??]

Have you seen the you tube of Walz? Do the columns of Voepel and Jenkins not suggest that they don't exactly appreciate Kim Mulkey? They suggest that coaches were less than enamored. Then, there are the known feuds, like with the LSU coach.

Kim does fit right in with what the Baylor perception has become. You don't see it on this board. But, try looking at the various football boards concerning their attitudes toward Baylor. I don't know that anyone is shedding tears that Baylor is finally under the microscope of the NCAA. The assertions against Briles by various coaches have been interesting, It sounds like what is said about Kim.

Go look at the discussion of adding BYU to the conference and see if Baylor isn't brought up.

Coaches tend not to be open with their negative remarks. See if you can find some that applaud Kim for her character development.

The freshman class at Baylor this year is the largest in history so I guess they forgot to read the mediocre columnists articles about Kim and follow the you tube videos from a single coach and get advice from someone who isn't even coaching anymore. They must be brainwashed and need guidance from a one track mind like yourself. Anyways keep dwelling in the past about Kim cuz that's all u have and I'll keep living in the present and proud to be a Baylor alum!

Conversation over lets just agree to disagree.

 

[sybarite]

The freshman class at Baylor this year is the largest in history so I guess they forgot to read the mediocre columnists articles about Kim and follow the you tube videos from a single coach and get advice from someone who isn't even coaching anymore. They must be brainwashed and need guidance from a one track mind like yourself. Anyways keep dwelling in the past about Kim cuz that's all u have and I'll keep living in the present and proud to be a Baylor alum!

Conversation over lets just agree to disagree.

Mediocre columnists? Voepel is probably the leading columnist on women's basketball.

Actually, we don't need to agree to disagree at all. It is quite simple. You remain on the Baylor board, which I never visit, and keep your opinions about OU off our board. We won't come to the Baylor board and assault your coach or school, which probably would get us thrown off your board and should get you thrown off this board. When you walk into someone's home and thrown mud, don't be surprised if they sic the dogs on you, or more.

 

[garyeb2]

Mediocre columnists? Voepel is probably the leading columnist on women's basketball.

Actually, we don't need to agree to disagree at all. It is quite simple. You remain on the Baylor board, which I never visit, and keep your opinions about OU off our board. We won't come to the Baylor board and assault your coach or school, which probably would get us thrown off your board and should get you thrown off this board. When you walk into someone's home and thrown mud, don't be surprised if they sic the dogs on you, or more.

Do you consider yourself an attack dog? i had you pictured as more of a lap cat.

 

[Sweetest OU Girl]

I'll keep living in the present and proud to be a Baylor alum!

Proud to be a Baylor alum due to present events? Are you not reading the news?

Not even the folks at Baylor are "proud" about what has been going on there. Why in the universe would you be proud that the University had multiple sexual crimes happening - involving their athletes - and finally had to dismiss - through various means - nearly the entire chain of leadership from the president to the athletic director and even down to a coach? Remember those are the same "leaders" who supported KM and her shenanigans. That is not the kind of thing to brag about gm. You may like winning. But there has to be a line somewhere - even for the most rabid fans.

I can assure you OU fans don't want you coming here and bragging about what has been happening at Baylor recently. Many are ashamed to even be in the same conference since in some indirect ways that mistreatment of young women impacts everyone's reputation.

 

[scrybe]

Do you consider yourself an attack dog? i had you pictured as more of a lap cat.

And your tasteless post reminds me that got mulk isn't the only dick hanging out on this board.

 

[tycat947]

And your tasteless post reminds me that got mulk isn't the only dick hanging out on this board.

:woot

 

[tycat947]

Proud to be a Baylor alum due to present events? Are you not reading the news?

Not even the folks at Baylor are "proud" about what has been going on there. Why in the universe would you be proud that the University had multiple sexual crimes happening - involving their athletes - and finally had to dismiss - through various means - nearly the entire chain of leadership from the president to the athletic director and even down to a coach? Remember those are the same "leaders" who supported KM and her shenanigans. That is not the kind of thing to brag about gm. You may like winning. But there has to be a line somewhere - even for the most rabid fans.

I can assure you OU fans don't want you coming here and bragging about what has been happening at Baylor recently. Many are ashamed to even be in the same conference since in some indirect ways that mistreatment of young women impacts everyone's reputation.

+1

Hypocrite U should not only be removed from Big 12 but NCAA as well. A truly disgusting institution from the top down!

 

[garyeb2]

And your tasteless post reminds me that got mulk isn't the only dick hanging out on this board.

Another razor sharp wit makes an appearance.

 

[Pike Pastor]

While it's clear that some on OUHoops despise Baylor and consider it a disgusting institution, the recent U.S. News and World Report 2017 College Rankings provide another perspective. Baylor ranked #71, not exactly something to crow about, but the second-highest ranking Big 12 school behind UT at #41. OU came in at #111.



http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandr...blic?school-name=Baylor+University&_mode=list

 

[sybarite]

While it's clear that some on OUHoops despise Baylor and consider it a disgusting institution, the recent U.S. News and World Report 2017 College Rankings provide another perspective. Baylor ranked #71, not exactly something to crow about, but the second-highest ranking Big 12 school behind UT at #41. OU came in at #111.



http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandr...blic?school-name=Baylor+University&_mode=list

Somehow, US News and World Report doesn't always seem to coincide with the evaluations of academics. I won't mention the #1 Big Twelve school, but Baylor would hardly be #2. We lost three highly-respected schools in Colorado, Missouri, and A&M. I think they tend to base a lot on endowments, an area in which Baylor is pretty good. But, they are not cited as an academic leader.

 

[tycat947]

While it's clear that some on OUHoops despise Baylor and consider it a disgusting institution, the recent U.S. News and World Report 2017 College Rankings provide another perspective. Baylor ranked #71, not exactly something to crow about, but the second-highest ranking Big 12 school behind UT at #41. OU came in at #111.



http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandr...blic?school-name=Baylor+University&_mode=list

They are by far the highest ranked immoral school in Big 12, I'll give them that! Penn State is highly ranked by USNWR too! SMH!

 

[sybarite]

I just looked through their list. The top twenty, maybe thirty, are probably solid. After that, it becomes fairly nonsensical. I don't think anyone will send their kid from North Carolina, California, New York, or Massachusetts to SMU or TCU for academic reasons.

 

[Pike Pastor]

Actually, Syb, A&M is now #74 and has steadily dropped in rank for the past three years. Colorado is #92 and Mizzou is tied at #111 with...OU.
USNWR is not the be-all-end-all benchmark, but it ain't chopped liver, either. If you don't want to recognize that BU is an "academic leader," that's your business. Just curious--where is OU considered an "academic leader?" Yes, as D-Bo is quick to announce, OU has more National Merit Scholars than any other public institution, and to be sure, that is impressive. But where does that translate into performance in research, publishing, etc? Hey, I sent my daughter to OU and the education she received shaped her life significantly, so I'm not throwing stones--just asking.
Syb, you and Sweetest and others despise BU and KM. Go for it. It doesn't look like their success will taper off any time soon.

But there is more to an institution than the antics of a WBB coach ( cough-hugely successful-cough) And yes, the dreadful way BU football and Title 9 offices shabbily stiff-armed the claims of women reporting sexual assault by football players deserved the housecleaning ordered by their Board of Regents. I'm not trying to convince you or anyone else that BU is a great place. Just humbly offering another perspective....