Elephantitis
New member
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2008
- Messages
- 15
- Reaction score
- 0
No. It is short sighted to way overpay for a coach, just so you can make a "splash" hire. You are better off hiring a good coach for 1.5m than a slightly better coach with a big name for $2.5m and a huge buyout.
I don't necessarily disagree that paying 10 million next year on a non-profitable sport is a dubious enterprise, but there is a gulf the size of a galaxy as far as future outcomes between hiring Brad Stevens at 2.5 million and Bruce Pearl or Kevin Stallings or Lon Kruger or Buzz Williams or maybe even Shaka Smart at 1.5 million.
Brad Stevens will win multiple national titles, somewhere. Maybe its Butler, maybe its Duke, maybe its OU. But within 20 years, he will have enough rings to vindicate the basketball program wherever he is at. There is no other young coach out there that you can make that projection. A Stevens' coached team cutting down the nets is inevitable.
Stevens has a system. A philosophy. A preparation-based strategy to attack opponents. He doesn't throw some one and done McD AAs out there and hope they just out talent the opponent. Stevens is a surgeon who knows how to move the chess pieces to exploit the opponents weaknesses.
If we want to have a national title in our future, guaranteed, we shell out for Stevens. If we want to just get back to being competitive, sure, Buzz Williams, a "good" coach, would be fine to get us back to the Sweet 16. But Williams, at OU, will just lose to Stevens, at Butler, in the tourney anyways.
How much is a national title worth? Is it worth 10 million? Is it worth taking a chance that Stevens would stay long enough at OU to win that title before Coach K retires, thus making Duke steal Stevens from wherever he's coaching? Who knows. But if Stevens coached at OU for 10 years, we'll have a national title and another Final Four or two banners hanging in Lloyd Noble.