What Is Your NCAA Tourney Seed Prediction?

Status
Not open for further replies.
dksooner said:
Still hanging at the 10 line I think.
Click to expand...

I dunno, feels very tenuous. I’m not overly worried about missing out entirely… unless all the bid thrives come through today, but I have a feeling we are heading to Dayton. Would be a way for the committee to reconcile our resume a bit
 
OUSKINS said:
I dunno, feels very tenuous. I’m not overly worried about missing out entirely… unless all the bid thrives come through today, but I have a feeling we are heading to Dayton. Would be a way for the committee to reconcile our resume a bit
Click to expand...
You could definitely be right. I'm just going off what the committee has done in the past with using the entirety of the season and not what have you done for me lately. The late burst trying to get in teams are fighting to be in dayton.
 
TEvans4Three said:
Don't like seeing us matched up with Gonzaga as the 7....no bueno
Click to expand...
Yep.

OU is in. The only concerns I have now are 1) 10 seed or 11 seed (play-in?) 2) who the opponent will be.

I would love to get matched up against Clemson...but they're trending towards being a 6 seed.

Washington State is probably my preferred (current) 7 seed. They're a good story but I don't think they're that good, honestly.
 
Last edited:
Lunardi latest has us as the top team in “last four in.” Basically what’s being discussed here… little to no danger of being out, but trending to Dayton. Would require Sparty, TAMU, or CSU bring slotted behind us to avoid Dayton (Lunardi has all 3 ahead of us)
 
WTSooner said:
Isn't this the opposite of being Built For March?

Most of those games are going to be against Quad 1 type opponents. And our record there isn't so great.
Click to expand...
When you don't have very many bullets, use the one(s) you do have? That's the way I viewed it, lol. Making a 4-12 Quad 1 graphic wouldn't be very ideal. :)
 
I GUESS the coaching staff thought it was worth the risk of a play in game to make sure they had everyone 100% healthy for the tournament. I can understand the reasoning even though they really took a gamble. I still think it’s within the realm of possibility that OU can win two games.

Hugley might be back for the tournament but I don’t think we should expect much. He wasn’t in shape enough to start after a whole offseason. There’s no way he’s in basketball shape right now. So Northweather will have to continue to step up. I don’t see why JM or Soares wouldn’t be 100% though.
 
Texas could drop out of the top 30 if a couple teams win today. Then OU would have to delete their silly graphic, and the one big selling point people are relying on would no longer apply.
 
Jerry Palm has us as a 10…. Interestingly has Northwestern as a play-in team. And if you look closer at metrics I think there is a case there for that.
 
Boom Soon said:
I just don’t want OU to play Gonzaga. Anyone but Gonzaga
Click to expand...
I don't know that Utah State in Salt Lake City would be any easier.

Everybody thought moving down from the 9 to the 10 seed would be better. Just makes that first game that much tougher.
 
StoopsBros said:
Click to expand...


More evidence that the field is pretty much set before the conference tournaments are decided.

I remember when ou beat ku’s ass in the big12 tournament title, had better wins than ku, but the committee had already set the bracket before the ou game was completed. We got the 2 seed and Ku got the 1 seed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

thebigabd
A look back at some of the non-conference wins
2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Boom Soon
B
thebigabd
Crazy season!
Replies
4
Views
261
BoulderSooner
BoulderSooner
O
Resume is Fine; Eye Test is Not
3 4 5
Replies
82
Views
3K
WichitaSooner
W
TEvans4Three
Sooners' Tournament Resume
2
Replies
27
Views
1K
TEvans4Three
TEvans4Three
Sooner04
What's Your Standard?
2 3
Replies
43
Views
9K
SoonerBounce13
SoonerBounce13
Back
Top