Secret Scrimmage vs. Marquette

[WichitaSooner]

It is actually the exact opposite of sexism! It is the one that gets offended that is the sexist one because they view it as an insult!

If I call a man a woman it is because they are acting like a woman. It has nothing to do with the value I place on women. Or do you think there are zero differences between men and women? Is it not ok to point out differences?

On the contrary, someone calling me illiterate is intelligist because you view people with a lower IQ as lesser value. It goes both ways man. You can't have your cake and eat it too

Calling someone who can't spell or write a proper sentence illiterate is an accurate, factual assertion. The crap you do, on the other hand, is stereotype an entire segment of the population based on generalities. Clearly, not every woman is "emotional," nor is every man unemotional. Nor is either of those things inherently good or bad, yet when you tell someone to stop acting like a woman, i.e., being emotional, you are clearly trying to imply that something is wrong with that. Again, like Steve pointed out, you understand this, but are so dug in that you will bury yourself rather than just admit how juvenile it is.

 

[BanjoCharley]

"Calling someone who can't spell or write a proper sentence illiterate is an accurate, factual assertion."

It's only factual if you have exhausted the study of all instances of that person's spelling or writing, otherwise it is only fortuitous.

 

[skyvue]

If I call a man a woman it is because they are acting like a woman.

"Acting like a woman." No, that's not sexist at all. How silly of me.

 

[SoonerBounce13]

Calling someone who can't spell or write a proper sentence illiterate is an accurate, factual assertion.

Full stop right here. LOL at thinking how someone types on a message board is evidence of their IQ and literacy is astounding
Don't forget you also call them idiots and doofuses.

 

[SoonerBounce13]

Calling someone who can't spell or write a proper sentence illiterate is an accurate, factual assertion. The crap you do, on the other hand, is stereotype an entire segment of the population based on generalities. Clearly, not every woman is "emotional," nor is every man unemotional. Nor is either of those things inherently good or bad, yet when you tell someone to stop acting like a woman, i.e., being emotional, you are clearly trying to imply that something is wrong with that. Again, like Steve pointed out, you understand this, but are so dug in that you will bury yourself rather than just admit how juvenile it is.

Once again, calling someone juvenile while at the same time making fun of their intelligence. Real mature pal (oops!)

Nothing wrong with being emotional. And me calling someone emotional just means they are showing more emotion than the situation calls for.
Is it wrong to point out to a child that they are being emotional when they are throwing a temper tantrum in the middle of walmart?
No of course not. You are simply pointing out that their actions are not acceptable for the situation.

But please continue to insult people while at the same time complaining about being insulted. It is good entertainment

 

[SoonerBounce13]

"Acting like a woman." No, that's not sexist at all. How silly of me.

It literally isn't. You have no idea what sexist actually means do you?

If I tell my 18 year old that they are acting like a child, does that mean I am agist? Does that mean that I view children as lesser value than teenagers?
No, it simply means they aren't being as they should. It says nothing about the thing I am comparing them to and all about the who that is being compared

Calling a man a woman is an indictment on the person being called a woman, not on women
On the same token, if I were to tell a woman that they are acting like a man, it is an indictment on the person being compared, not what they are being compared to

 

[steverocks35]

Calling someone who can't spell or write a proper sentence illiterate is an accurate, factual assertion. The crap you do, on the other hand, is stereotype an entire segment of the population based on generalities. Clearly, not every woman is "emotional," nor is every man unemotional. Nor is either of those things inherently good or bad, yet when you tell someone to stop acting like a woman, i.e., being emotional, you are clearly trying to imply that something is wrong with that. Again, like Steve pointed out, you understand this, but are so dug in that you will bury yourself rather than just admit how juvenile it is.

He indeed buried himself.

 

[IndySooner]

It literally isn't. You have no idea what sexist actually means do you?

If I tell my 18 year old that they are acting like a child, does that mean I am agist? Does that mean that I view children as lesser value than teenagers?
No, it simply means they aren't being as they should. It says nothing about the thing I am comparing them to and all about the who that is being compared

Calling a man a woman is an indictment on the person being called a woman, not on women
On the same token, if I were to tell a woman that they are acting like a man, it is an indictment on the person being compared, not what they are being compared to

Bounce going full Bounce in this thread. Wichita going full Wichita. You can tell it's almost basketball season!

 

[MiketheH]

Legitimate Rhetorical Question: Why does every thread on this board end in a pointless and personal argument?

 

[SoonerBounce13]

Legitimate Rhetorical Question: Why does every thread on this board end in a pointless and personal argument?

just wait until the season starts and we will get a couple months of good discussion

 

[WichitaSooner]

It literally isn't. You have no idea what sexist actually means do you?

If I tell my 18 year old that they are acting like a child, does that mean I am agist? Does that mean that I view children as lesser value than teenagers?
No, it simply means they aren't being as they should. It says nothing about the thing I am comparing them to and all about the who that is being compared

Calling a man a woman is an indictment on the person being called a woman, not on women
On the same token, if I were to tell a woman that they are acting like a man, it is an indictment on the person being compared, not what they are being compared to

Actually, everything you have said in attempting to defend your archaic point of view is an indictment of you.

 

[CoachTalk]

Actually, everything you have said in attempting to defend your archaic point of view is an indictment of you.

Everything you dish out and now you’re the victim. How times WT went after me and my family you liked his post and never said a word.

Welcome to the show big boy. Put your big boy pants on.

 

[WichitaSooner]

Everything you dish out and now you’re the victim. How times WT went after me and my family you liked his post and never said a word.

Welcome to the show big boy. Put your big boy pants on.

Not a victim at all. Like I said, most of the sexist crap posted has been directed at other people, not me. And the stuff that has been directed at me doesn’t personally offend me at all. I don’t care how misogynists think of me. I just don’t think there is any place for sexism on the board, but apparently lots of you disagree. I guess the good thing is, people who post that garbage expose what type of person they are

 

[SoonerBounce13]

Not a victim at all. Like I said, most of the sexist crap posted has been directed at other people, not me. And the stuff that has been directed at me doesn’t personally offend me at all. I don’t care how misogynists think of me. I just don’t think there is any place for sexism on the board, but apparently lots of you disagree. I guess the good thing is, people who post that garbage expose what type of person they are

Oh bless your heart

 

[paboomersooner]

I came to an OU basketball message board and Stanford/Cal-Berkeley messengers showed up. I think the posters some of you are looking for are to the left.

Lighten up Francis('). Some of you take yourselves entirely to serious.

On a side note, how is my sentence structure? Spelling? These things are very important on a "formal" message board.

 

[WichitaSooner]

I came to an OU basketball message board and Stanford/Cal-Berkeley messengers showed up. I think the posters some of you are looking for are to the left.

Lighten up Francis('). Some of you take yourselves entirely to serious.

On a side note, how is my sentence structure? Spelling? These things are very important on a "formal" message board.

Apparently you should head to a MAGA board instead. No doubt it will have plenty of insults tossed around that the boomers among you can enjoy.

 

[SoonerBounce13]

Apparently you should head to a MAGA board instead. No doubt it will have plenty of insults tossed around that the boomers among you can enjoy.

yes, because only MAGAs insult people lol
good gravy man

 

[TINY]

Apparently you should head to a MAGA board instead. No doubt it will have plenty of insults tossed around that the boomers among you can enjoy.

That is ageist and there’s no place for it on a message board! /sarcasm

 

[paboomersooner]

Apparently you should head to a MAGA board instead. No doubt it will have plenty of insults tossed around that the boomers among you can enjoy.

This didn't hit as hard or is as witty as you think. Sentence structure still good?

 

[CoachTalk]

Not a victim at all. Like I said, most of the sexist crap posted has been directed at other people, not me. And the stuff that has been directed at me doesn’t personally offend me at all. I don’t care how misogynists think of me. I just don’t think there is any place for sexism on the board, but apparently lots of you disagree. I guess the good thing is, people who post that garbage expose what type of person they are

You missed the part of the comment about your home boy WT. But par for the course. Expect nothing less.

You’ve been “exposed” more than anyone but you’re still here.